Rankings by Cost, Opportunity, Resources and Risk

Best States to Start a Small Business in 2026

Updated: February 1, 2026

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

Wyoming, South Dakota and North Dakota rank as the best states to start a small business in 2026. California ranks dead last at #51 despite its tech reputation.

Wyoming leads with a composite score of 68.98 and the nation's best tax climate. California scores 29.73, dragged down by America's worst cost structure, a 39-point gap separating best from worst.

A small business earning $500,000 annually with 10% margins faces $12,000 to $15,000 in annual cost differences between these states. That money could fund hiring, marketing or emergency reserves.

Location choices create lasting financial impacts for every entrepreneur.

KEY FINDINGS
  • Great Plains Lead: Wyoming (#1, 68.98), South Dakota (#2, 57.76) and North Dakota (#3, 56.07) occupy the top three spots. These states combine no income taxes or low income taxes with low operating costs. Montana (#4) and Iowa (#7) round out the region's strong presence in the top 10.
  • Unexpected Winners: Mississippi (#6, 46.63) and Delaware (#5, 49.53) break expectations. Mississippi excels in survival rates and low costs. Delaware's business-friendly incorporation laws and infrastructure create advantages beyond tax havens.
  • California's Challenge: California ranks #51 (29.73) with America's worst cost structure (13.42 pillar score). Silicon Valley can't offset the prohibitive business climate for bootstrapped Main Street businesses.
  • Survival Rates Don't Follow Cost: Pennsylvania (#18) posts the nation's highest survival rate (90.17 risk pillar). Cheap states don't guarantee success; business quality matters more than formation quantity.

See how small-business conditions vary across the country:

By the Numbers: America's Small Business Divide

Overall score

Wyoming: 68.98
California: 29.73

2.3x

Tax climate (costs pillar)

South Dakota: 95.76
California: 13.42

7.1x

Survival rate (risk pillar)

Pennsylvania: 90.17

Washington. D.C.: 15

6x

Business environment

Wyoming: 68.02
West Virginia: 7.65

8.9x

Resources and Capital

North Dakota: 50.32
Alaska: 10.33

4.9x

State-level cost differences compound with small business insurance costs that vary by location and industry. For a detailed breakdown of small business taxes by state, see our comprehensive tax analysis. The business environment score captures formation rates, job creation and infrastructure. Growth rate differences help entrepreneurs choose locations strategically.

Top 10 Best States to Start a Business

Great Plains states claim four of the top seven spots (Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota and Iowa). These states excel in costs and stability. The top 10 average 72.48 on the Costs and Taxes pillar compared to a national average of 54. Wyoming offers the easiest path to business formation from regulatory and tax perspectives.

Delaware (#5, 49.53) benefits from business-friendly incorporation laws and strong infrastructure. The state offers streamlined incorporation processes and favorable business law. Mississippi (#6, 46.63) defies stereotypes with strong survival rates (68.58 risk pillar). Low costs and stability compensate for limited resources. Iowa (#7, 45.32) excels in business survival with a risk pillar score of 79.99, ranking fourth nationally for long-term stability.

Businesses need 30% to 40% higher revenue in California to match Wyoming profitability. Wyoming has no state income tax and low operating costs. Montana ranks #4 with strong survival rates (68.44) and moderate costs (76.18).

Florida ranks #9 with balanced performance across all pillars and no state income tax despite high cost of living. Texas ranks #8 with the second-highest survival pillar score among the top 10 (74.14). Utah rounds out the top 10 at #10 with low business costs, favorable tax climate, and one of the fastest-growing populations in the nation

1
Wyoming
68.98
68.02
50.94
94.20
53.59
2
South Dakota
57.76
39.10
43.31
95.76
63.42
3
North Dakota
56.07
43.97
50.32
73.42
67.09
4
Montana
49.92
36.01
31.02
76.18
68.44
5
Delaware
49.53
44.78
39.19
55.16
66.59
6
Mississippi
46.63
40.93
20.69
63.34
68.58
7
Iowa
45.32
31.46
20.93
66.20
79.99
8
Texas
44.79
27.77
27.59
68.18
74.14
9
Florida
44.34
27.51
29.61
69.86
66.32
10
Utah
43.43
30.58
28.67
62.54
65.50
UNDERSTANDING LOW-POPULATION STATE RANKINGS

Wyoming, South Dakota and North Dakota rank in the top three thanks to strong tax climates and low operating costs. Small populations create trade-offs.

What These States Offer:

  • No or low state income taxes
  • Minimal regulatory burden
  • Low electricity and operating costs
  • Business-friendly incorporation laws

What They Don't Offer:

  • Large local customer bases
  • Deep talent pools for hiring
  • Extensive business infrastructure
  • Major metropolitan markets

Best For: E-commerce businesses, consulting firms, location-independent entrepreneurs and companies serving national markets rather than local customers.

Consider Larger Markets If: Your business needs local foot traffic, access to specialized talent pools or proximity to major metropolitan infrastructure.

WHEN HIGH-COST STATES WORK FOR YOUR BUSINESS

Massachusetts (#43), New York (#47) and California (#51) rank poorly for cost reasons. Certain business models thrive there despite the rankings:

Venture-Backed Startups: Access to concentrated VC networks in Boston, NYC and Silicon Valley outweighs tax disadvantages. Massachusetts ranks second nationally in VC funding per capita.

Specialized Talent: Biotech, finance and tech companies find concentrated talent pools unavailable elsewhere. Massachusetts has the highest percentage of adults with graduate degrees (19.4%).

Premium Markets: Luxury goods, high-end professional services and businesses targeting affluent consumers can pass costs to customers. NYC metro median household income is 28% above the national average.

Industry Clusters: Film production (California), financial services (New York) and life sciences (Massachusetts) have established ecosystems where proximity to partners and customers justifies costs.

If your business needs these advantages, don't rule out high-cost states automatically. Calculate whether market access offsets the 15-25% higher operating costs our rankings reflect.

Bottom 10 Worst States to Start a Business

The 10 states with the worst cost structures average 26.8 on the costs pillar (California, Hawaii, New York, New Jersey, Washington, D.C., Connecticut, Massachusetts, Washington, Maryland and Rhode Island). These states struggle with operating costs, not business formation or infrastructure.

Washington, D.C., (#47, 32.50) has the bottom 10's highest business environment score (47.97) but the nation's worst survival rate (15). West Virginia (#46, 32.66) has the nation's lowest business environment score (7.65) but strong survival rates (78.14). Washington (#44, 34.44) ranks low despite no state income tax. The high cost of living (36.75) undermines tax advantages.

New York ranks #50 (30.17) with a low costs score (20.45) despite world-class infrastructure.

51
California
29.73
32.14
18.24
13.42
65.83
50
New York
30.17
27.02
18.97
20.45
69.73
49
Hawaii
30.32
32.85
20.15
15.00
62.68
48
Alaska
31.64
16.48
10.33
66.39
42.58
47

Washington, D.C.

32.50
47.97
24.87
24.34
15.00
46
West Virginia
32.66
7.65
11.28
62.50
78.14
45
Alabama
33.84
18.84
21.75
55.71
53.52
44
Washington
34.44
26.71
27.79
36.75
60.07
43
Vermont
34.60
33.93
12.79
41.81
53.48
42
Connecticut
34.76
33.39
19.50
28.55
69.10

Why California Ranks Last for Small Business

California houses Silicon Valley, leads tech innovation and created legendary companies (Apple, Google, Facebook). Yet California ranks #51 for small business — the worst state for bootstrapped entrepreneurs.

California ranks #51 (29.73) with the nation's worst cost structure (13.42 costs pillar score). This score is 7.1 times worse than South Dakota's 95.76.

Where California Struggles
The pillar breakdown:

  • Costs and Taxes: 13.42 (lowest in nation, 82.34 points below South Dakota)
  • Resources and Capital: 18.24 (below average despite tech talent)
  • Business Environment: 32.14 (middle of the pack)
  • Risk and Stability: 65.83 (above average; businesses that survive do well)

California's cost structure scores 13.42 out of 100, 7.1 times worse than South Dakota (95.76). This gap makes bootstrapped success nearly impossible for Main Street businesses. The 82.34-point difference reflects gaps in taxes, electricity and cost of living.

Who Succeeds vs. Who Struggles
California works for well-funded tech startups with VC backing, high-margin businesses (software, consulting), established corporations with revenue scale and businesses where talent access outweighs cost concerns.

California challenges bootstrapped Main Street businesses, low-margin operations (restaurants, retail), service businesses without capital cushions and cost-sensitive entrepreneurs.

When California Makes Sense Despite the Ranking
California's #51 ranking reflects genuine cost and regulatory challenges affecting most small businesses. But the state offers advantages our methodology doesn't capture. California's 39 million residents and $3.9 trillion economy (the largest state GDP) create unmatched market access for businesses that can absorb higher costs. Tech startups with VC backing, entertainment businesses and companies needing specialized talent pools find California's ecosystem worth the premium. E-commerce businesses can offset California's operating costs by serving the massive in-state market while incorporating in lower-tax states. Our ranking measures ease of starting and operating, not revenue potential. For high-margin businesses targeting California customers, the state can make financial sense.

The Silver Lining
California's risk pillar score (65.83) shows businesses surviving the high costs often thrive. The survival rate sits above average. California filters for quality, not quantity. But the barrier to entry remains prohibitively high for most entrepreneurs.

Best Places to Start a Business by Industry

Overall rankings provide a starting point, but industry-specific factors change which states perform best. Entrepreneurs should get business insurance before launching in any state to cover liability, property damage and other risks. Insurance costs vary by state and industry.

    computer icon
    Tech Companies

    Utah (#10), Delaware (#5) and Colorado (#20) balance talent pools with lower costs than California. Tech and IT businesses benefit from Utah's growing workforce and Delaware's business-friendly infrastructure.

    wine icon
    Restaurants and Retail

    Thin margins make costs critical. Texas (#8), Florida (#9) and Mississippi (#6) combine low costs with strong survival rates. Mississippi's low costs (63.34) and high survival rate (68.58) work well for restaurant ventures. Low-margin businesses like restaurants and retail shops need general liability insurance. Costs vary by state.

    methodologyTwo icon
    Manufacturing

    South Dakota (#2), North Dakota (#3) and Iowa (#7) offer strong cost structures (SD: 95.76, ND: 73.42, IA: 66.20) plus central locations. Manufacturing operations benefit from low electricity prices and right-to-work status.

    briefcase icon
    Professional Services

    Delaware (#5), Colorado (#20) and North Carolina (#13) provide balanced environments. Delaware's business environment score of 44.78 and moderate costs (55.16) suit consulting businesses. Professional liability insurance costs remain manageable.

    bag icon
    E-commerce

    Wyoming (#1), South Dakota (#2), Delaware (#5) and Texas (#8) offer tax advantages (no income tax in WY, SD, TX). E-commerce businesses benefit from favorable nexus rules and logistics infrastructure.

    houseRebuild icon
    Trades and Construction

    Texas (#8), Florida (#9) and Utah (#10) benefit from population growth driving construction demand. Workers' compensation insurance costs vary widely by state. Service businesses need commercial auto insurance for mobile operations.

Insights from Our Analysis

MoneyGeek's data reveals three patterns that challenge conventional wisdom about where businesses succeed.

  1. 1
    The Survival Reality

    Pennsylvania (#18, 41.41) posts the nation's highest risk/stability score (90.17) despite ranking only 18th overall. North Carolina (#13, 85.16), Illinois (#16, 82.85) and Iowa (#7, 79.99) also excel in survival.

    Established business ecosystems with decades of infrastructure create stable conditions even when formation rates lag. Cheap states don't guarantee success, as business quality matters more than quantity.

  2. 2
    The Cost-Performance Gap

    High-cost states hoped other advantages would compensate. The data says no. The 10 states with the worst cost structures average 26.8 on the costs pillar compared to the top 10 average of 72.48, a 45.68-point gap.

    Three examples: 

    • California (13.42) vs. South Dakota (95.76): 82.34-point spread
    • New York (20.45) vs. South Dakota (95.76): 75.31-point spread  
    • Hawaii (15.00) vs. Wyoming (94.20): 79.20-point spread

    For entrepreneurs prioritizing tax efficiency, South Dakota (95.76) and Wyoming (94.20) lead.

  3. 3
    The Unexpected Winners

    Mississippi (#6, 46.63) defies stereotypes with strong survival rates (68.58 risk pillar), moderate costs (63.34) and strong business environment (40.93).

    Delaware (#5, 49.53) succeeds through incorporation-friendly laws (44.78 business environment), moderate costs (55.16) and strong survival rates (66.59).

    Both states show reputation doesn't equal reality. Data-driven location choices matter.

Methodology

MoneyGeek analyzed all 50 states plus the District of Columbia across 14 metrics organized into four weighted pillars. Each metric was normalized to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better conditions for small businesses. Our Four-Pillar Scoring Framework follows:

  • Business Environment & Opportunity (40% weight)
    The entrepreneurial ecosystem is foundational. Without strong business formation and infrastructure, other advantages matter less. Includes business formation rate, small business job creation share, small business employment share and broadband availability. All metrics equally weighted at 10% of total score.
  • Access to Resources & Capital (20% weight)
    Includes loans per small business (8%), high-propensity business applications (6%), college-educated population (3%) and working-age population growth (3%). Traditional bank financing received highest weight because 70% of small businesses use bank loans.
  • Business Costs & Taxes (25% weight)
    Includes Tax Foundation tax competitiveness score (12.5%), commercial electricity price (6.25%) and regional price parity (6.25%). Taxes received 50% of this pillar because they're permanent costs that scale with success.
  • Failure Risk & Stability (15% weight)
    Includes five-year establishment survival rate (9%), one-year survival rate (3.75%) and natural disaster risk (2.25%). Lower weight because survival rates reflect historical conditions.

Pillar scores were combined to produce final Overall Scores (0-100). 

This ranking focuses on state-level business climate factors affecting "Main Street" small businesses. It doesn't include city-specific programs, federal taxes, individual circumstances or qualitative factors. State-level data masks variation between metro and rural areas.

Full Dataset

Explore the complete rankings with detailed breakdowns of all four pillar scores for every state.

1
Wyoming
68.98
68.02
50.94
94.2
53.59
2
South Dakota
57.76
39.1
43.31
95.76
63.42
3
North Dakota
56.07
43.97
50.32
73.42
67.09
4
Montana
49.92
36.01
31.02
76.18
68.44
5
Delaware
49.53
44.78
39.19
55.16
66.59
6
Mississippi
46.63
40.93
20.69
63.34
68.58
7
Iowa
45.32
31.46
20.93
66.2
79.99
8
Texas
44.79
27.77
27.59
68.18
74.14
9
Florida
44.34
27.51
29.61
69.86
66.32
10
Utah
43.43
30.58
28.67
62.54
65.5
11
Oklahoma
43.39
29.59
22.85
67.35
67.62
12
Idaho
43.35
33.13
29.95
68.28
46.94
13
North Carolina
42.9
21.84
26.72
64.2
85.16
14
Indiana
42.48
27.18
16.83
65.25
79.51
15
Nebraska
41.72
28.4
23.07
64.4
64.3
16
Illinois
41.7
32.66
20.2
48.67
82.85
17
Michigan
41.45
30.4
11.99
60.32
78.74
18
Pennsylvania
41.41
27.62
18.42
52.62
90.17
19
Tennessee
41.27
22.75
25.79
69.12
64.86
20
Colorado
40.91
40.99
27.65
49.45
44.15
21
South Carolina
40.77
23.73
26.03
57.8
77.49
22
Nevada
40.09
32.88
16.87
59.23
58.35
23
Kansas
39.43
30.75
19.42
62.16
51.39
24
Maine
39.02
29.78
25.49
48.81
65.4
25
New Hampshire
38.94
34.67
17.72
52.29
56.36
26
Georgia
38.84
27.12
21.37
55.62
65.45
27
Ohio
38.72
24.95
12.8
57.63
78.47
28
Wisconsin
38.59
21.12
18.19
60.38
76.04
29
Oregon
38.5
39.49
15
47.95
51.47
30
Missouri
38.11
27.14
25.92
66.27
36.67
31
Kentucky
38.05
20.16
16.51
62.05
74.49
32
Louisiana
37.87
24.76
16.95
59.53
64.65
33
Minnesota
37.55
32.42
15.94
45.27
67.15
34
Maryland
37.18
35.17
19.04
37.64
65.97
35
New Mexico
36.97
30.49
11.81
60.93
47.83
36
New Jersey
36.87
36.23
28.72
23.41
71.85
37
Arkansas
36.79
21.22
31.2
62.8
42.39
38
Arizona
36.68
26.05
18.32
54.78
59.31
39
Virginia
36.29
24.53
20.43
53.4
60.28
40
Massachusetts
35.42
31.13
19.57
29.82
77.36
41
Rhode Island
35.25
34.02
17.09
38.53
57.26
42
Connecticut
34.76
33.39
19.5
28.55
69.1
43
Vermont
34.6
33.93
12.79
41.81
53.48
44
Washington
34.44
26.71
27.79
36.75
60.07
45
Alabama
33.84
18.84
21.75
55.71
53.52
46
West Virginia
32.66
7.65
11.28
62.5
78.14
47

Washington, D.C.

32.5
47.97
24.87
24.34
15
48
Alaska
31.64
16.48
10.33
66.39
42.58
49
Hawaii
30.32
32.85
20.15
15
62.68
50
New York
30.17
27.02
18.97
20.45
69.73
51
California
29.73
32.14
18.24
13.42
65.83

About Nathan Paulus


Nathan Paulus headshot

Nathan Paulus is the Head of Content at MoneyGeek, where he conducts original data analysis and oversees editorial strategy for insurance and personal finance coverage. He has published hundreds of data-driven studies analyzing insurance markets, consumer costs and coverage trends over the past decade. His research combines statistical analysis with accessible financial guidance for millions of readers annually.

Paulus earned his B.A. in English from the University of St. Thomas, Houston.


sources
Copyright © 2026 MoneyGeek.com. All Rights Reserved