In 60 of the 100 U.S. counties where renters are most exposed to uninsured flood losses, fewer than 1% of homes carry National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) coverage. Three of the top five counties are New York City boroughs (the Bronx, Brooklyn, and Manhattan), and inland cities like St. Louis, Milwaukee, and Cleveland outrank most coastal markets.
The 100 US Counties Where Renters Are Most Exposed to Uninsured Flood Losses
In 61 of the 100 highest-risk counties for renters, fewer than 1% of homes carry NFIP flood insurance, leaving tenants exposed unless they buy separate flood coverage.
Updated: May 27, 2026
Updated: May 27, 2026
Advertising & Editorial Disclosure
Standard renters insurance doesn’t cover floodwater, and renters have no lender requiring them to buy a separate flood policy. The shortfall runs widest where flood risk is high, renter incomes are low, and flood insurance uptake is scarce.
The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies counts more than 18 million U.S. rental homes in areas projected to lose value or income from climate-related hazards. After Hurricane Helene in 2024, only 2.6% of renter households who registered for FEMA assistance had any property insurance, per JCHS. Renters fill 34.8% of U.S. housing units, but only 0.2% of NFIP coverage protects their belongings.
- Three New York City boroughs rank in the top five: the Bronx (No. 1), Brooklyn (No. 3), and Manhattan (No. 4). A fourth borough, Queens, ranks No. 54.
- In 60 of the top 100 counties, fewer than 1% of residential structures carry NFIP flood insurance.
- Median renter income across the top 100 is $43,809, roughly $9,000 below the national renter median of $52,966.
- 99 of the top 100 counties have renter cost burden rates above 40%, meaning more than four in ten renters spend at least 30% of income on housing.
- Many of the highest-risk counties are inland, not coastal. St. Louis (No. 2), Milwaukee (No. 6), and Cleveland/Cuyahoga County (No. 11) all rank in the top 15 on riverine flood risk, low renter incomes, and near-zero NFIP penetration.
Each of 3,117 U.S. counties scored on four factors: flood risk (35% of the composite, from FEMA’s National Risk Index), renter population share (25%), renter income vulnerability (20%), and NFIP coverage (20%, inverted so low coverage drives the score up). Higher composite scores mean more renters, more flood exposure, lower income, and less flood coverage. Full methodology below.
The 10 Counties Where Renters Are Most Exposed
All 10 counties share flood risk scores above 94 and NFIP penetration below 5%. What separates them is the mix of renter share, renter income, and coverage. None of the gap closes through standard renters policies; flood insurance for renters requires a separate NFIP or private policy.
- 1Bronx County, New York (89.0)
Four in five of the Bronx's 534,100 occupied housing units are renter-occupied, totaling 426,925 households. Median renter income is $40,723. The borough scores 98.5 on FEMA inland flood risk with 2.3% NFIP penetration (1,842 contracts in force).
- 2St. Louis (independent city), Missouri (82.5)
St. Louis ranks second on coverage alone. Just 137 residential NFIP contracts are in force citywide, a 0.1% penetration rate. The city carries a 97.0 flood score, a 54.7% renter share across 144,891 occupied units, and $40,752 median renter income.
- 3Kings County (Brooklyn), New York (82.5)
Brooklyn pairs a 99.4 inland flood score with 87.2 coastal exposure and more than 712,000 renter households across 1,009,927 occupied units. Median renter income is $66,161; NFIP penetration runs 2.9%, with 8,065 contracts in force.
- 4New York County (Manhattan), New York (81.0)
Manhattan combines a 75.0% renter share with a 99.2 flood risk score. Higher renter income ($84,783) softens some of the exposure, but only 1.5% of homes carry NFIP coverage (1,886 contracts in force across 583,299 renter households).
- 5Essex County, New Jersey (81.0)
Essex, which includes Newark, pairs a 98.8 flood score with 176,209 renter households and a 55.1% renter share. Median renter income is $51,273, with NFIP penetration at 1.9%.
- 6Milwaukee County, Wisconsin (80.6)
Milwaukee carries a 97.0 inland flood score, a 50.1% renter share (196,633 renter households), and 0.5% NFIP penetration (1,013 contracts in force). Median renter income is $44,490.
- 7Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (80.5)
Philadelphia carries the top 10's highest flood risk score at 99.6, paired with a 48.2% renter share (327,523 renter households), $48,344 median renter income, and just 0.3% NFIP penetration.
- 8Baltimore city, Maryland (80.5)
Baltimore matches Philadelphia at 0.3% NFIP penetration, with a 94.3 flood score, 52.5% renter share (134,197 renter households), and $43,788 median renter income.
- 9Hudson County, New Jersey (80.2)
Hudson has the top 10's highest renter share at 69.3% (207,608 renter households) and a 98.6 flood score. Higher renter income ($75,879) cushions some of the exposure; NFIP penetration sits at 3.5%.
- 10Shelby County (Memphis), Tennessee (80.1)
Shelby closes the top 10 with a 98.7 flood score, a 45.9% renter share (166,362 renter households), $44,088 median renter income, and 0.7% NFIP penetration.
Full Ranking: 100 Counties With the Highest Uninsured Renter Flood Risk
The table below lists all 100 counties by composite score. Standard renters insurance doesn’t cover floodwater. Renters who want flood protection need a separate NFIP or private flood policy.
1 | Bronx, New York | 98.54 | 426,925 | $40,723 | 2.3% |
2 | St. Louis, Missouri | 96.98 | 79,279 | $40,752 | 0.1% |
3 | Kings, New York | 99.36 | 712,011 | $66,161 | 2.9% |
4 | New York, New York | 99.24 | 583,299 | $84,783 | 1.5% |
5 | Essex, New Jersey | 98.82 | 176,209 | $51,273 | 1.9% |
6 | Milwaukee, Wisconsin | 97.04 | 196,633 | $44,490 | 0.5% |
7 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | 99.59 | 327,523 | $48,344 | 0.3% |
8 | Baltimore, Maryland | 94.27 | 134,197 | $43,788 | 0.3% |
9 | Hudson, New Jersey | 98.57 | 207,608 | $75,879 | 3.5% |
10 | Shelby, Tennessee | 98.66 | 166,362 | $44,088 | 0.7% |
11 | Cuyahoga, Ohio | 98.73 | 225,378 | $40,410 | 0.2% |
12 | Pulaski, Arkansas | 96.76 | 74,143 | $40,190 | 1.1% |
13 | Franklin, Ohio | 98.79 | 260,976 | $52,781 | 0.3% |
14 | Los Angeles, California | 100.0 | 1,848,466 | $66,677 | 0.5% |
15 | Hinds, Mississippi | 95.13 | 37,315 | $32,030 | 2.8% |
16 | Champaign, Illinois | 90.36 | 39,299 | $33,434 | 0.3% |
17 | Marion, Indiana | 98.28 | 173,991 | $45,770 | 0.7% |
18 | Fresno, California | 98.7 | 144,331 | $49,705 | 0.4% |
19 | Imperial, California | 94.12 | 21,434 | $38,992 | 0.1% |
20 | Dougherty, Georgia | 87.56 | 18,742 | $38,240 | 2.8% |
21 | Oklahoma, Oklahoma | 97.65 | 137,172 | $44,020 | 0.5% |
22 | Doña Ana, New Mexico | 98.38 | 29,315 | $32,698 | 1.2% |
23 | Dallas, Texas | 99.55 | 483,826 | $59,770 | 0.8% |
24 | Wayne, Michigan | 99.4 | 246,939 | $37,565 | 0.5% |
25 | Suffolk, Massachusetts | 94.72 | 207,832 | $69,876 | 2.5% |
26 | Hamilton, Ohio | 96.91 | 144,332 | $41,891 | 0.4% |
27 | Passaic, New Jersey | 97.84 | 83,966 | $51,907 | 2.2% |
28 | Fayette, Kentucky | 92.68 | 64,594 | $43,391 | 0.4% |
29 | Humboldt, California | 94.18 | 23,869 | $41,604 | 0.7% |
30 | Bexar, Texas | 99.65 | 309,018 | $49,697 | 0.8% |
31 | Hampden, Massachusetts | 95.87 | 69,691 | $36,774 | 0.4% |
32 | Montgomery, Alabama | 94.05 | 38,598 | $39,479 | 0.9% |
33 | Jackson, Missouri | 96.5 | 125,355 | $45,021 | 0.2% |
34 | Kern, California | 98.47 | 113,798 | $46,101 | 1.2% |
35 | Davidson, Tennessee | 98.19 | 153,381 | $56,133 | 1.8% |
36 | Providence, Rhode Island | 96.6 | 111,642 | $48,754 | 0.5% |
37 | Jefferson, Kentucky | 99.11 | 125,573 | $44,530 | 1.2% |
38 | Clark, Nevada | 99.62 | 364,134 | $54,645 | 0.2% |
39 | Tulsa, Oklahoma | 97.93 | 109,868 | $46,926 | 0.7% |
40 | Jefferson, Alabama | 98.09 | 97,464 | $41,092 | 0.5% |
41 | Lucas, Ohio | 95.42 | 69,694 | $38,365 | 0.6% |
42 | Leon, Florida | 91.51 | 58,151 | $41,086 | 2.8% |
43 | Cook, Illinois | 99.94 | 887,660 | $55,388 | 0.5% |
44 | Guilford, North Carolina | 96.63 | 88,003 | $45,099 | 0.4% |
45 | Lubbock, Texas | 92.11 | 56,165 | $42,035 | 0.8% |
46 | Richmond, Georgia | 86.48 | 37,409 | $37,596 | 0.9% |
47 | Erie, New York | 99.01 | 140,013 | $42,230 | 0.4% |
48 | Floyd, Kentucky | 97.81 | 4,089 | $24,030 | 3.3% |
49 | Richland, South Carolina | 94.56 | 66,738 | $40,012 | 1.4% |
50 | Washington, D.C. | 97.42 | 189,808 | $76,809 | 1.1% |
51 | Cabell, West Virginia | 91.92 | 14,085 | $28,906 | 1.0% |
52 | Lane, Oregon | 97.2 | 64,671 | $46,642 | 1.6% |
53 | El Paso, Texas | 96.82 | 107,181 | $39,575 | 1.1% |
54 | Queens, New York | 99.33 | 463,708 | $72,003 | 3.7% |
55 | Pima, Arizona | 99.52 | 152,188 | $45,489 | 0.7% |
56 | Pitt, North Carolina | 87.72 | 36,189 | $39,307 | 2.4% |
57 | Caddo, Louisiana | 92.05 | 38,112 | $31,161 | 4.3% |
58 | Butte, California | 93.23 | 35,595 | $43,174 | 1.9% |
59 | Brazos, Texas | 82.79 | 48,421 | $37,341 | 2.0% |
60 | Allegheny, Pennsylvania | 99.2 | 190,128 | $46,532 | 0.4% |
61 | Sedgwick, Kansas | 96.09 | 76,373 | $43,105 | 0.4% |
62 | Monroe, New York | 96.69 | 115,720 | $43,830 | 0.4% |
63 | Montgomery, Ohio | 95.52 | 86,837 | $43,098 | 0.5% |
64 | Danville, Virginia | 81.52 | 9,957 | $37,021 | 0.2% |
65 | Tuscaloosa, Alabama | 91.63 | 34,755 | $36,149 | 0.8% |
66 | Muscogee, Georgia | 87.28 | 40,025 | $43,837 | 0.8% |
67 | Tulare, California | 98.12 | 59,494 | $50,925 | 3.0% |
68 | Mecklenburg, North Carolina | 98.95 | 209,360 | $62,675 | 0.8% |
69 | Multnomah, Oregon | 95.55 | 163,104 | $59,000 | 0.5% |
70 | Alachua, Florida | 88.58 | 53,601 | $38,969 | 2.6% |
71 | Tarrant, Texas | 99.14 | 318,750 | $56,894 | 0.9% |
72 | Bell, Kentucky | 82.03 | 4,092 | $19,393 | 1.7% |
73 | Fulton, Georgia | 97.68 | 211,288 | $62,287 | 0.8% |
74 | Richmond, Virginia | 82.63 | 58,914 | $48,196 | 0.6% |
75 | Bernalillo, New Mexico | 96.28 | 101,241 | $44,381 | 0.5% |
76 | Kanawha, West Virginia | 97.9 | 22,131 | $35,630 | 1.5% |
77 | Washington, Arkansas | 90.14 | 43,131 | $45,221 | 0.7% |
78 | Forsyth, North Carolina | 94.66 | 58,280 | $43,013 | 0.4% |
79 | Capitol Planning Region (Hartford), Connecticut | 99.05 | 134,059 | $49,201 | 0.5% |
80 | Mobile, Alabama | 95.9 | 54,913 | $36,158 | 3.7% |
81 | Broome, New York | 93.19 | 29,085 | $36,405 | 1.8% |
82 | Merced, California | 94.69 | 39,581 | $50,208 | 5.3% |
83 | Greene, Missouri | 88.8 | 55,680 | $41,578 | 0.2% |
84 | Warren, Kentucky | 87.34 | 24,679 | $41,538 | 0.3% |
85 | DeKalb, Georgia | 96.25 | 118,371 | $54,357 | 1.1% |
86 | Lackawanna, Pennsylvania | 94.08 | 30,519 | $39,028 | 1.2% |
87 | Douglas, Nebraska | 95.07 | 91,733 | $48,803 | 0.5% |
88 | Bibb, Georgia | 80.44 | 29,119 | $33,680 | 0.4% |
89 | Onondaga, New York | 95.17 | 67,371 | $41,636 | 0.7% |
90 | Winnebago, Illinois | 94.37 | 39,606 | $40,502 | 0.6% |
91 | Orange, Florida | 98.41 | 227,990 | $58,569 | 3.4% |
92 | Hidalgo, Texas | 96.44 | 87,939 | $36,139 | 4.0% |
93 | Monongalia, West Virginia | 84.99 | 18,811 | $33,682 | 0.4% |
94 | Cumberland, North Carolina | 89.25 | 58,430 | $46,059 | 1.2% |
95 | Clayton, Georgia | 87.79 | 48,159 | $45,679 | 0.4% |
96 | South Central Planning Region (New Haven), Connecticut | 96.88 | 91,053 | $50,418 | 3.2% |
97 | Ingham, Michigan | 88.49 | 47,469 | $38,673 | 0.7% |
98 | Roanoke, Virginia | 84.13 | 20,723 | $40,701 | 0.7% |
99 | Mendocino, California | 95.1 | 13,342 | $48,929 | 1.0% |
100 | Denver, Colorado | 95.26 | 171,873 | $71,437 | 0.4% |
Where Renter Flood Vulnerability Concentrates
Renter flood vulnerability does not track broader insurance geography. Home insurance rates are highest in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas, but the counties where renters carry the most uninsured flood exposure follow a different pattern.
Why Southern Renters Carry the Largest Share of Top-100 Counties
Thirty counties from the southern interior land in the top 100, the largest regional group. Georgia leads with seven; Kentucky and North Carolina contribute five each. The lowest median renter incomes in the entire ranking sit in Appalachian eastern Kentucky: Bell County at $19,393 and Floyd County at $24,030. Virginia, West Virginia, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee each add two or three counties.
How Western Renter Flood Risk Concentrates in California and Texas
Twenty-three western counties rank in the top 100, the second-largest group. California leads with nine, more than any state. Los Angeles (No. 14) holds a 100 flood risk score, tied for the highest in the dataset, and 1.8 million renter households; NOAA logged 22 flood and flash flood events in LA County in 2024. Texas adds seven, led by Dallas (No. 23) with 23 NOAA-recorded events the same year. Oregon, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Colorado fill the rest of the region.
Where Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Renters Are Most Exposed to Flooding
The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic region has 21 counties in the top 100, anchored by New York’s eight: the Bronx (No. 1), Kings (No. 3), Manhattan (No. 4), Erie (No. 47), Queens (No. 54), Monroe (No. 62), Broome (No. 81), and Onondaga (No. 89). New York’s statewide renter share, 45.7%, is among the highest in the country.
New Jersey adds Essex (No. 5), Hudson (No. 9), and Passaic (No. 27). Pennsylvania contributes Philadelphia (No. 7), Allegheny (No. 60), and Lackawanna (No. 86); NOAA logged 44 flood and flash flood events in Allegheny County in 2024. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. round out the region. Standard renters policies cover water damage from burst pipes and accidental leaks but not from rising floodwater or coastal-storm flooding.
Why Midwest Counties Show the Lowest NFIP Coverage in the Ranking
Seventeen Midwest counties rank in the top 100. Ohio anchors the region with five, led by Cleveland/Cuyahoga County (No. 11). Missouri adds three behind St. Louis at No. 2, and Illinois contributes three including Champaign (No. 16). Coverage runs especially thin here: St. Louis (0.1%), Cuyahoga (0.2%), and Franklin (0.3%) all sit well below the top-100 median of 0.7%. Renters insurance covers property damage from fire, theft, and windstorms, but floodwater damage requires a separate policy.
How Gulf Coast and Southeast Counties Rank After Flood Coverage Is Factored In
Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi account for nine of the top 100. Alabama contributes four (Montgomery, Jefferson, Tuscaloosa, and Mobile). Florida places three; NOAA recorded 46 flood and flash flood events in Leon County (Tallahassee) in 2024, the most of any top-100 county. Hinds County, Mississippi (No. 15) and Caddo Parish, Louisiana (No. 57) close the group. Some southeastern counties with high flood risk fall out of the top 100 because higher countywide NFIP coverage offsets part of their exposure.
Renter Income and the Flood Insurance Shortfall
Median renter income across the top 100 counties is $43,809, about $9,000 below the national renter median of $52,966, per 2024 ACS data. Three counties carry median renter incomes below $30,000: Bell County, Kentucky ($19,393), Floyd County, Kentucky ($24,030), and Cabell County, West Virginia ($28,906).
Cost burden runs deep too. In 99 of the top 100 counties, more than 40% of renters spend at least 30% of income on housing. Clayton County, Georgia tops the list at 59.4%, followed by Alachua County, Florida (58.1%) and Brazos County, Texas (57.8%).
NFIP penetration runs below 1% in 60 of the top 100 counties; the median across all 100 is 0.7%. Renters and homeowners pay for different coverage, and neither standard policy covers flood.
Why Renters Are the Least Protected Group in Flood-Prone Counties
The renter coverage shortfall starts with property rights. Renters don’t own the buildings they live in, so a landlord’s coverage doesn’t extend to a tenant’s furniture, electronics, or clothing. Home insurance covers most natural-disaster damage to a building itself, but floodwater is typically excluded, and a landlord’s policy never covers a tenant’s belongings.
NFIP outreach has historically targeted homeowners and mortgage holders. Lenders in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) require borrowers to carry flood insurance, which is why NFIP penetration inside SFHAs runs much higher than countywide rates. Renters without a mortgage have no one pushing them to buy.
Local rebuilding decisions tend to follow homeowner priorities. Homeowners vote on bond measures, attend planning meetings, and sit on land-use boards. Renters have fewer direct channels into floodplain protection or relocation decisions, and after a flood event, a landlord’s call on whether to rebuild often decides whether tenants return at all.
What Renters in These Counties Can Do
Standard renters insurance won’t pay a dollar of floodwater damage, and a landlord’s policy won’t cover a tenant’s belongings. These four steps close that exposure.
- 1Check FEMA flood maps for your address.
The FEMA Flood Map Service Center shows whether your unit sits inside a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), the high-risk zones where lenders require coverage from owners. Renting inside an SFHA is the clearest signal to buy flood coverage.
- 2Get an NFIP contents-only quote.
NFIP sells contents-only flood policies for renters, capped at $100,000 in personal property coverage. Annual premiums run roughly $99 to $400 for renters outside high-risk zones.
- 3Compare private flood insurers.
Some private carriers sell standalone flood coverage with higher limits or faster claim turnaround than NFIP. Flood insurance coverage varies widely by state, so quote both NFIP and private options before buying.
- 4Document belongings before storm season.
Photograph or video each room, save receipts for high-value items, and store the file in cloud storage. Renters who can prove what they lost settle claims faster, whether through flood insurance or FEMA disaster assistance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Renters insurance, flood insurance, and NFIP coverage often get conflated. The questions below clarify what each covers, what it costs, and when renters should buy a separate policy.
Does renters insurance cover flood damage?
No. Standard renters insurance covers water damage from burst pipes, accidental leaks, and indoor overflows but not floodwater from rivers, streets, or coastal storms. Renters need a separate flood policy through the NFIP or a private flood insurer.
How much does flood insurance cost for renters?
NFIP contents-only flood policies for renters typically run $99 to $700 a year, depending on flood zone, the value of insured belongings, and deductible. Renters in low-risk zones usually pay near the low end. Private flood policies vary more widely; the only reliable comparison is a quote.
What is NFIP penetration?
NFIP penetration is the share of residential structures in a county that carry a National Flood Insurance Program policy. A 1% rate means one in 100 homes is covered. FEMA’s OpenFEMA program publishes the data; it includes both owner-occupied and renter-eligible buildings without distinguishing between them.
Who needs flood insurance as a renter?
Any renter inside a Special Flood Hazard Area should weigh flood insurance regardless of building age or landlord coverage, because landlord policies do not extend to tenant belongings. The same goes for renters outside SFHAs but near rivers, streams, low-lying coastal areas, or in counties with recent flood events.
Methodology
MoneyGeek’s analysis combined four county-level datasets to produce a composite vulnerability score for 3,117 U.S. counties.
The FEMA National Risk Index (v1.20, December 2025) supplied inland and coastal flood risk scores. The Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (2020 to 2024 five-year estimates) provided renter household counts, renter share, and median renter household income. The OpenFEMA NFIP Residential Penetration Rates dataset (April 2026) measured the share of residential structures carrying NFIP flood insurance in each county. The NOAA Storm Events Database (2024) provided county-level flood event counts, filtered to two event types: flood and flash flood.
The score weights four normalized metrics on a 0 to 100 scale: flood risk (35%), renter population share (25%), renter income vulnerability (20%), and insurance coverage shortfall (20%). Flood risk uses the higher of a county’s inland or coastal flooding score to capture the primary hazard. Renter share is the ratio of renter-occupied to total occupied housing units. Income vulnerability is the inverse of median renter household income. Insurance coverage shortfall is the inverse of NFIP residential penetration. Weights emphasize physical flood exposure while still capturing socioeconomic vulnerability and insurance access.
Counties with missing flood data, zero renter households, or unreported renter income were excluded. For 181 counties where NFIP penetration data was unavailable, MoneyGeek scored the insurance coverage shortfall as if penetration were zero. The final dataset includes 3,117 counties.
NFIP penetration measures insured residential structures as a share of total residential structures. It doesn’t distinguish between homeowner and renter policies, and it excludes private flood insurance. Because NFIP policies are mostly held by homeowners, this proxy likely overstates renter coverage, meaning true renter vulnerability is higher than these scores show.
Connecticut uses planning regions rather than counties; the Census Bureau and FEMA treat them as county equivalents, and they appear in the ranking under those names.
About Myryah Irby

Myryah Irby is a writer and data journalist at MoneyGeek. Her work spans original data studies and how-to guides covering auto, home and health insurance, consumer costs, and transportation safety.
Research and Analysis
Since joining MoneyGeek in late 2025, Irby has produced data studies on insurance costs, consumer spending and transportation risk. Her published work includes a 50-state analysis of winter driving danger using fatality and weather severity data; research tracking the relationship between rhodium commodity prices and catalytic converter theft rates, including state-level theft trends and what those rates mean for insurance costs; a state-by-state comparison of winter home heating costs; and an analysis of the full cost of having a baby in America: hospital bills, insurance and out-of-pocket expenses.
Career
Irby has more than 20 years of editorial and writing experience. Since 2005, she has run Irby x Irby, her own editorial and copywriting practice, with clients including The New York Times, The San Francisco Chronicle, OpenAI and the National Park Service. From 2019 to 2023, she served as Senior Managing Editor and then Copywriting Manager at Callisto Media, a nonfiction publisher acquired by Penguin Random House in May 2023, where she led a team of writers and graphic designers.
Before that, she spent nearly 11 years at QuinStreet, a performance marketing company that runs content and comparison sites in insurance and personal finance. She rose from Managing Editor to Senior Managing Editor between 2010 and 2016. Earlier in her career, she edited at Collabrys for nearly four years and tutored doctoral candidates on dissertation writing at the University of San Francisco.
Sources
- Federal Emergency Management Agency. "National Risk Index for Natural Hazards, v1.20." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- U.S. Census Bureau. "American Community Survey, 2020 to 2024 Five-Year Estimates." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- OpenFEMA. "NFIP Residential Penetration Rates." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Storm Events Database, 2024." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. "Renters Vulnerable to Climate Disasters Amid Insurance Gaps." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. "The State of the Nation’s Housing 2025." Accessed May 27, 2026.
- Insurance Information Institute. "Facts + Statistics: Renters Insurance." Accessed May 27, 2026.
