America's Uninsured Map Mirrors Its Electoral Map

Updated: June 5, 2026

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

Forty-two percent of America's uninsured live in just 10 states. All 10 voted for Donald Trump in 2024 and declined federal Medicaid expansion. The gap is stark. Non-expansion states average 12.1% uninsured, while expansion states average 6.7%. Texas alone has about 588,000 people in the coverage gap. They earn too much for Medicaid but too little for marketplace subsidies. These people must find health insurance through alternative options. 

Health care policy creates a clear divide. Some states took federal money and expanded Medicaid right away. Fewer people lack insurance in those states, and the economy benefits. Other states said no. They want to control their own budgets and avoid federal strings. Expansion opponents worry Washington will eventually cut funding and stick states with the tab.

mglogo icon
KEY FINDINGS
  • Non-expansion states average 12.1% uninsured vs. 6.7% in expansion states.
  • These 10 states hold 42% of America's uninsured while making up just 28% of the population.
  • Texas alone accounts for more than 40% of the national coverage gap (588,000 people).
  • All 10 non-expansion states voted for Trump in 2024.
  • Republican-leaning states average 9.8% uninsured vs. 6% in Democrat-leaning states.

Mapping the Divide

The map below shows uninsured rates by state using 2024 ACS data. Hover over any state to see its uninsured rate, estimated uninsured count, expansion status and election outcome. Medicaid expansion correlates with lower uninsured rates across nearly every state.

Republican States vs. Democratic States

MoneyGeek calculated population-weighted averages based on 2024 election results. States that voted Republican average 9.8% uninsured. States that voted Democratic average 6%.

Does this mean politics drives health care policy? The data shows that both factors reinforce each other. States made expansion decisions based on fiscal philosophy and federal trust. These same priorities shape voting patterns. Health coverage now functions as a policy debate and a political identifier.

The Numbers Behind the Gap

The average number of uninsured in non-expansion states is 12.1% (11.6 million people) compared to 6.7% (16.2 million) in expansion states. The national uninsured total rose by about 1.0 million people from 2023 to 2024, pushing the rate from 7.9% to 8.2%. The South and Midwest experienced the sharpest increases after pandemic-era Medicaid protections expired.

The table below ranks all 50 states and Washington, D.C., by uninsured rate and shows how expansion status and election outcomes align across the country.

1
Texas
16.7%
5,243,588
No
Trump
2
Georgia
12.0%
1,337,436
No
Trump
3
Oklahoma
11.5%
466,190
No
Trump
4
Nevada
11.4%
364,136
Yes
Trump
5
Alaska
11.0%
81,415
Yes
Trump
6
Florida
10.9%
2,547,571
No
Trump
7
Arizona
10.3%
780,986
Yes
Trump
8
Wyoming
10.3%
60,158
No
Trump
9
New Mexico
10.1%
213,551
Yes
Harris
10
Mississippi
9.7%
285,150
No
Trump
11
Tennessee
9.7%
691,270
No
Trump
12
Arkansas
9.4%
290,305
Yes
Trump
13
Idaho
9.2%
183,667
Yes
Trump
14
South Carolina
9.0%
483,620
No
Trump
15
Montana
8.8%
99,687
Yes
Trump
16
North Carolina
8.6%
932,252
Yes
Trump
17
Kansas
8.5%
249,977
No
Trump
18
Utah
8.3%
287,556
Yes
Trump
19
Alabama
8.2%
422,931
No
Trump
20
South Dakota
8.1%
74,465
Yes
Trump
21
Colorado
7.9%
470,642
Yes
Harris
22
Louisiana
7.7%
352,179
Yes
Trump
23
Missouri
7.7%
478,448
Yes
Trump
24
New Jersey
7.7%
715,595
Yes
Harris
25
Indiana
7.5%
516,826
Yes
Trump
26
Nebraska
7.1%
140,923
Yes
Trump
27
Delaware
6.9%
72,582
Yes
Harris
28
Illinois
6.9%
863,663
Yes
Harris
29
Virginia
6.9%
601,383
Yes
Harris
30
Kentucky
6.8%
307,778
Yes
Trump
31
Ohio
6.7%
789,458
Yes
Trump
32
Washington
6.5%
506,076
Yes
Harris
33
Maryland
6.3%
390,383
Yes
Harris
34
North Dakota
6.1%
47,819
Yes
Trump
35
California
5.9%
2,326,445
Yes
Harris
36
Connecticut
5.8%
213,154
Yes
Harris
37
Pennsylvania
5.8%
751,778
Yes
Trump
38
West Virginia
5.8%
102,664
Yes
Trump
39
Maine
5.5%
77,384
Yes
Harris
40
Iowa
5.4%
173,821
Yes
Trump
41
Wisconsin
5.3%
313,281
No
Trump
42
Oregon
5.2%
220,135
Yes
Harris
43
Michigan
5.1%
511,900
Yes
Trump
44
Minnesota
5.1%
296,053
Yes
Harris
45
New York
5.0%
964,999
Yes
Harris
46
Rhode Island
4.6%
50,398
Yes
Harris
47
Washington, D.C.
4.5%
31,601
Yes
Harris
48
New Hampshire
4.5%
63,149
Yes
Trump
49
Vermont
4.2%
27,194
Yes
Harris
50
Hawaii
3.5%
49,225
Yes
Harris
51
Massachusetts
2.8%
196,039
Yes
Harris

The divide sharpens when states are grouped by expansion status. Ten non-expansion states hold 28% of the U.S. population but account for 42% of the uninsured. The 41 expansion states and Washington, D.C., represent 72% of the population but only 58% of the uninsured.

Non-Expansion
10
96,202,049 (28%)
12.10%
11,636,166
41.80%
Expansion
41
243,908,939 (72%)
6.70%
16,220,720
58.20%
mglogo icon

Our analysis of prescription drug costs shows that residents in non‑expansion states also face some of the steepest jumps when they lose Medicaid and have to pay cash for medications.

Why Don’t States Expand?

States that haven't expanded Medicaid cite long-term cost concerns. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick told KERA in January 2025: "We are one of the states that didn't go along with that Medicaid expansion and thank goodness, because I wouldn't say we'd be bankrupt now, but a lot of the states that did are in deep fiscal trouble."

A 2025 Paragon Health Institute survey found 58% of respondents agreed with this statement: "It's wrong for the federal government to pay so much more for able-bodied adults than traditional Medicaid recipients." Critics fear federal funding won't last and believe states should control their own health policy decisions.

Why Some States Break the Mold

Wisconsin doesn't fit the pattern. The state refused Medicaid expansion, yet only 5.3% of residents lack insurance. How? Wisconsin uses its own money to cover adults who are earning up to the poverty line. Taxpayers pay more this way, but fewer people go uninsured.

wisconsin icon
WISCONSIN'S ALTERNATIVE PATH

Wisconsin said no to expansion but built BadgerCare Plus instead. The program covers about 1 million adults using state dollars. The rate matches expansion states like New York (5%) and California (5.9%).

The tradeoff: Wisconsin spends about $9,800 per enrollee compared to the $8,800 national average for expansion states receiving 90% federal funding. Wisconsin gains complete policy control, but taxpayers pay more per person.

Nevada shows the opposite outcome. It expanded Medicaid but records an 11.4% uninsured rate, one of the nation's highest. Heavy reliance on service sector jobs, large immigrant populations with coverage barriers and rural access challenges drive the high rate.

North Carolina expanded Medicaid in late 2023, yet its uninsured rate is 8.6%. Expansion takes time to reach eligible residents, so active enrollment efforts continue.

Expansion strongly predicts lower uninsured rates, but state economies and local policy choices matter, too.

What Happened to Health Coverage After the 2025 Subsidy Expiration?

The enhanced ACA premium tax credits expired on December 31, 2025, and Congress did not renew them. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed in July 2025, let the enhanced credits lapse on schedule, so the larger subsidies that covered more enrollees through 2025 are gone as of 2026. Marketplace shoppers now pay under the pre-2021 subsidy rules, and the 400% federal poverty level subsidy cliff returned on January 1, 2026.

The cost effect landed quickly. Average monthly premium payments rose about 58%, from $113 to $178, and average 2026 ACA premiums include deductibles that climbed about 37% to a record $3,786. Because subsidies shrank while sticker prices rose, the amount enrollees owe each month went up even where the underlying plan premium changed little.

Enrollment fell as a result. ACA Marketplace signups are projected to drop from 22.3 million in 2025 to about 17.5 million in 2026, a decline of roughly 4.8 million people. A KFF survey in early 2026 found that about 9% of people who held Marketplace coverage in 2025 are now Americans without coverage, an early signal that the coverage gains of recent years are reversing.

The divide this study documents got wider, not narrower. The 10 states that have not expanded Medicaid still account for 42% of the nation's uninsured while holding 28% of its population, and the subsidy expiration removes one of the few tools that had been narrowing the gap in those states. About 1.4 million people remain in the coverage gap nationally, earning too much for traditional Medicaid but too little for Marketplace subsidies, and Texas alone holds roughly 42% of that group, about 588,000 people.

What changes the picture from here is state policy, not federal subsidy timing. A non-expansion state that adopts Medicaid expansion closes its coverage gap directly, because expansion covers adults up to 138% of the federal poverty level regardless of the Marketplace subsidy rules. Until that happens, residents in the 10 non-expansion states will keep carrying the highest uninsured rates in the country, led by Texas at 16.7% as of the 2024 American Community Survey.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below, we answer the questions readers ask most about which states have the highest uninsured rates, why the Medicaid expansion divide persists and what the 2025 subsidy expiration changed.

Which state has the highest uninsured rate?

Which states have not expanded Medicaid?

Why do non-expansion states have higher uninsured rates?

Did ACA subsidies expire in 2026?

Methodology

MoneyGeek analyzed American Community Survey data from 2023 and 2024 to calculate uninsured rates in each state. We then matched those rates against 2024 election results to see how red and blue states compare.

We weighted our averages by state population to compare expansion states against non-expansion states and red states against blue states.

The Kaiser Family Foundation provided coverage gap numbers. We marked the expansion status based on each state's policy in October 2025. North Carolina expanded in December 2023, so we counted it as an expansion state. The ACS data lets us track changes year over year — the national uninsured rate climbed from 7.9% in 2023 to 8.2% in 2024.

About Nathan Paulus


Nathan Paulus, Head of Content and SEO, MoneyGeek

Nathan Paulus is Head of Content and SEO at MoneyGeek, where he leads content strategy and produces original data research across insurance, consumer costs, transportation safety, housing, public policy and personal finance. He also reviews published studies for methodology, source quality and factual accuracy before they reach readers.

Research and Analysis

In nearly six years at MoneyGeek, Paulus has published more than 100 original studies and explanatory guides. His insurance research includes 50-state comparisons of health care outcomes, costs and access; an analysis of how uninsured rates track with state Medicaid expansion decisions and electoral patterns; full coverage auto rate analyses across major insurers in all 50 states; and a study of how premium trends track with industry underwriting losses, with combined ratio data sourced from Fitch Ratings, AM Best and Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI figures. His research also covers vehicle pricing trends across the U.S. new car market, summer traffic fatality rates by state, homeowner underinsurance ratios using mortgage and policy data, and housing affordability across all 50 states.

His research has been cited by Bloomberg, the Los Angeles Times, Forbes, Fast Company, the San Francisco Chronicle, USA Today and NBC Los Angeles. Harvard, MIT, Stanford and Yale have also referenced his work.

Career

Growing up, Paulus developed an early interest in personal finance through his grandmother, who emphasized saving over earning as the foundation of financial stability. Her framing still shows up in how he writes about money for people without a financial background.

Paulus joined MoneyGeek in July 2020 as Director of Content Marketing. In that role, he led the content team and directed data journalism production across insurance and personal finance verticals. He was promoted to Head of Marketing and Communications in December 2023, where he took on digital PR and communications strategy. He has held his current role as Head of Content and SEO since January 2025.

Before MoneyGeek, he served as Director of Content Marketing and SEO at Ventrix Advertising. There, he helped build two content sites from scratch, contributed to link-building programs that secured more than 1,500 unique referring domains within a year, and co-managed a marketing team of more than 20 people. Earlier, he spent two and a half years at ABUV Media, moving up from Marketing Research Analyst to Senior Marketing Tactics Analyst, where he built his grounding in audience research, content strategy and SEO.


Sources