Worst States for New Drivers (2026)

Updated: August 10, 2026

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

In Mississippi, drivers aged 15 to 20 are involved in fatal crashes at a rate of 71.5 per 100,000 licensed teen drivers, the highest rate in the country. Insuring a 16-year-old costs $203 a month, or $2,430 a year.

In Florida, the teen fatal crash rate is 20% lower. Insuring a 16-year-old costs $651 a month, or $7,812 a year, more than three times as much.

Both states are hard on families. The price tag tells you almost nothing about which one is dangerous.

About 12.4 million Americans aged 15 to 20 hold a driver's license. Where they live sets what their families pay, how much supervised practice the law requires and how likely a new driver is to be in a fatal crash.

The timing matters. The American Automobile Association (AAA) reviewed federal crash data and found that more than 30% of deaths in crashes involving a teen driver from 2019 through 2023 occurred between Memorial Day and Labor Day, a stretch it calls the 100 Deadliest Days.

That window is still open. School is starting, and a new group of 16-year-olds is about to start driving to school without a parent in the car.

MoneyGeek combined four measures to rank where those conditions are worst: fatal crash involvement for drivers aged 15 to 20 (2022 to 2024), the monthly premium to insure a 16-year-old, how much room a state has to strengthen its graduated licensing law and local driving conditions. Florida ranks worst. Massachusetts ranks best. The analysis covers 49 states; Kentucky and Washington, D.C., were excluded for reasons explained in the methodology.

For broader context on state driving conditions, see MoneyGeek's Best and Worst States for Driving.

mglogo icon
KEY FINDINGS
  • Florida is the worst state in the country for a new driver, scoring 67.9 out of 100. Insuring a 16-year-old costs $651 a month, or $7,812 a year, the highest in the nation and nine times Hawaii's $72 a month.
  • Mississippi has the deadliest roads for teen drivers but ranks third, not first. Its fatal crash involvement rate of 71.5 per 100,000 licensed teen drivers leads the country, yet low premiums ($203 a month) pull its overall score below Florida's and Louisiana's.
  • The states where teens are most likely to die aren't the states where insuring them costs most. Across 49 states, teen premiums and teen fatal crash rates correlate at just 0.23. In the more rural half of the country, the teen crash rate is 39.8 at an average $231 a month. In the more urban half, the rate is 37.5 at an average $342 a month.
  • Twelve of the 15 worst states are in the South or West. The South averages a 49 score against the Northeast's 28.1, and five of the 10 best-ranked states are in the Northeast.
  • North Dakota has the weakest teen licensing law in the country yet ranks 13th. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety projects the state could cut its teen fatal crash rate by 56% by adopting best-practice provisions, the largest available reduction of any state. Its low crash rate and moderate premiums keep it out of the bottom 10.
  • Massachusetts ranks best, scoring 12 out of 100 on the strength of the second-strongest licensing law, a low crash rate of 21.2 and $223-a-month teen premiums.

New Driver Risk by State (2026)

Composite score from 0 to 100, where 100 is worst, combining teen crash risk, insurance cost, licensing-law strength and driving conditions.

Source: MoneyGeek analysis of NHTSA FARS 2022 to 2024, FHWA Highway Statistics 2024, IIHS Graduated Licensing Calculator, NOAA/NCEI daily station data and MoneyGeek rate data.

Note: Kentucky and Washington, D.C., are excluded. Higher composite score means worse conditions for a new driver. Rhode Island and Vermont are based on fewer than 30 teen drivers involved in fatal crashes across 2022 to 2024; read their crash rates with that caution. Monthly premiums are rounded to whole dollars, and annual figures come from unrounded monthly rates, so a monthly figure times 12 can differ by a few dollars.

Best and Worst by Measure

Florida is the worst state overall, but no state is worst on every measure: Mississippi has the deadliest teen roads, North Dakota the weakest licensing law and Alaska the most adverse-weather days.

Composite score
Florida (67.9)

Massachusetts (12)

55.9 points
Teen fatal crash rate per 100,000 licensed 15–20
Mississippi (71.5)
Minnesota (16.3)
4.4x
Monthly premium, 16-year-old
Florida ($651)
Hawaii ($72)

9x

Projected fatal crash reduction available
North Dakota (56%)
Connecticut (17%)
39 points
Adverse-weather days per year
Alaska (214)
Texas (41)
5.2x

10 Worst States for New Drivers

Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi rank as the three worst states for a new driver, and nine of the 10 worst are in the South or West.

1
Florida
67.9
74.2

100

71.8
13.5
2
Louisiana
66.5
68.9
95.3
64.1
30.1
3
Mississippi
64.9

100

22.5
79.5

47

4
New Mexico
64.7
97.6
32.2
76.9
40.9
4
Montana
64.7

61

30.7
92.3
78.2
6
Arizona
62.7
95.8
60.4
61.5
17.4
7
Tennessee
58.7
75.1
51.4
64.1
36.2
8
Missouri

58

66.1
49.9
71.8
38.6
9
Alaska
56.4
35.6

54

66.7
77.8
10
Wyoming
55.4
48.5
39.6
64.1
74.8

Where the Worst States Cluster

The worst states for new drivers concentrate in the South and West, the two regions with the highest average composite scores, 49 and 45.8.

South
15

49

47.8
$337
39%
West
13
45.8
42.8
$279
38%
Midwest
12
41.9
32.3
$234
45%
Northeast
9
28.1

26

$291
28%

Six of the 15 worst states are in the South, and six are in the West. The South's crash rate averages 47.8 against the Northeast's 26, nearly double. The Northeast also has the strongest licensing laws as a group, averaging 28% additional reduction available against the Midwest's 45%.

The Midwest is the most mixed region. Its crash rates are low, second only to the Northeast, but it has the weakest licensing laws in the country on average, including the two weakest individual states, North Dakota and Iowa.

Who Is Affected

About 12.4 million people aged 15 to 20 held a driver's license across the 49 states in this analysis, out of roughly 25.9 million residents in that age range (Federal Highway Administration Table DL-22, 2024; U.S. Census Bureau population estimates, vintage 2023). Just under 2 million of those licensed teen drivers live in the 10 worst-ranked states.

Across the three years measured, an average of 4,875 drivers aged 15 to 20 were involved in a fatal crash each year.

Texas
1,069,817
11
Florida
698,417
1
Tennessee
292,570
7
Missouri
262,632
8
Arizona
255,856
6

Texas and Florida together account for more than 1.7 million licensed teen drivers, and both rank in the worst 11.

Cost and Crash Risk Don't Track Together

Across 49 states, teen premiums and teen fatal crash rates correlate at just 0.23, weak enough that one tells you almost nothing about the other.

Rural driving explains most of it. A new driver's risk also depends on who else is on the road, a factor MoneyGeek measures separately in its ranking of states with the worst drivers. 

Rural roads carry higher speeds, fewer barriers, more at-grade intersections and longer emergency response times, which raises the chance that any given crash is fatal. Congested urban roads put more vehicles in closer proximity, which drives up claim frequency and settlement costs.

A limited-access highway is the simplest road a new driver will use; a two-lane rural collector with unsignalized crossings is among the hardest. The two are different risks, and insurance prices the second one.

The split is visible in the halves of the country:

More rural half (24 states)
39.8
$231
More urban half (25 states)
37.5
$342

The more rural half has slightly deadlier roads for teen drivers and pays about a third less to insure them.

Premiums do reflect risk, once rural driving is accounted for. In a regression of premiums on both the rural share of driving and the teen crash rate, the crash rate carries a statistically significant positive coefficient. Insurers are not ignoring where teens crash. Fatal crash rates and insurance claim costs simply are not the same measurement, and a state can rank high on one and low on the other.

For families, that means a low teen premium is not a safety signal. It reflects the claim environment where you live, not the odds your 16-year-old crashes.

northCarolina icon
NORTH CAROLINA: CHEAP AND DANGEROUS

North Carolina has the fourth-highest teen fatal crash rate in the country at 59.3 per 100,000 licensed teen drivers. Insuring a 16-year-old there costs $184 a month, or $2,208 a year, among the lowest figures in the nation and less than a third of Florida's.

Its overall rank is 16th, held down almost entirely by that low premium. North Carolina is the clearest case in the dataset of a state where price offers a family no information about risk. A parent comparing quotes across state lines would conclude North Carolina is an easy place to add a teen driver. The crash data says the opposite.

How Much Licensing Law Explains

MoneyGeek measured licensing strength using the IIHS Graduated Licensing Calculator, which estimates how much a state could reduce its teen fatal crash rate by adopting the strongest version of five provisions: a minimum permit age of 16, at least 70 supervised practice hours, a minimum intermediate license age of 17, a night driving restriction starting at 8 p.m. and a ban on all teen passengers. A larger available reduction means a weaker current law.

The passenger restriction is the provision aimed most directly at distraction. AAA research puts distraction in roughly six of 10 teen crashes and identifies other teenagers in the car as the largest single source, ahead of phones and dashboard screens. A state that allows a newly licensed 16-year-old to carry friends immediately has left the most common distraction unregulated.

The range is wide. Connecticut has the strongest law in the country, with only 17% additional reduction available. North Dakota has the weakest, at 56%.

Licensing strength does not line up neatly with crash rates. Across 49 states, the correlation between available reduction and teen fatal crash rate is 0.24, about the same weak relationship seen between cost and crashes. North Dakota has the weakest law and a below-average crash rate. Mississippi has the seventh-weakest law and the worst crash rate in the country.

The fit is loose for two reasons. Cross-sectional data cannot separate a law's effect from the conditions that prompted it, since states with poor crash records sometimes strengthen laws in response. And rural driving moves crash rates regardless of what any statute requires. 

IIHS projections estimate what stronger provisions would achieve inside a state, not what explains differences between states.

That's not an argument against stronger licensing law; each of the five provisions IIHS scores has a measured effect in its research. It means a state's rank reflects four forces at once, and licensing is one.

kentucky icon
WHY KENTUCKY ISN’T IN THIS RANKING

Kentucky appears at or near the top of most published teen driver danger rankings, and it does so because of an error in its own paperwork.

Every per-capita teen crash rate requires a count of licensed teen drivers. Kentucky reports 67,914 licensed drivers aged 15 to 20 to the Federal Highway Administration, which is 19% of its 15-to-20 population. The national median is 50%, and after accounting for how rural a state is, Kentucky's expected share is 57%. Its reported figure sits about three standard deviations below expectation, the largest deviation of any state.

The likely cause is structural: Kentucky issues its intermediate license as a sticker applied to the existing permit card rather than as a separate license document, and its data submission appears not to count those drivers as licensed. The pattern goes back decades and has widened since 2019.

Because that count is the denominator, Kentucky's rank depends entirely on which figure is used. As filed, its rate is 135.5 per 100,000, first in the country by a wide margin. At the national median licensed share, it is 52.5 and ranks about 12th.

I could have published Kentucky at number one. Every other ranking does, and the number is sitting right there in the federal file. I excluded it instead, because a rank built on a denominator the state's own filing gets wrong isn't a finding about Kentucky's roads. It's a finding about Kentucky's paperwork.

Washington, D.C., comes out on the same basis, with the added problem of only eight teen drivers involved in fatal crashes across three years, too few to produce a stable rate.

What This Means for Premiums

Adding a teenager is the single largest percentage increase most families will see on an auto policy. MoneyGeek's analysis of adding a child to a car insurance policy found that a teen on a family policy costs an average of $2,718 a year, compared with $5,108 for the same driver on a standalone policy, a 47% saving for staying on the family plan. Keeping a new driver on the parents' policy is the highest-value decision available to most families.

Beyond that, the levers that matter vary by which side of the cost and risk split a family is on.

Carrier shopping pays off most where the base rate is highest. Florida, Louisiana, Delaware and Connecticut run $517 to $651 a month for a 16-year-old, and the difference between the cheapest and most expensive carrier for a teen driver is usually wider than the difference between states; MoneyGeek's cheapest car insurance for 16-year-olds analysis lists the lowest-priced carrier in each state. Good-student discounts, driver-training credits and telematics programs also return the most where the base premium is largest.

The opposite problem shows up in Mississippi, North Carolina and New Mexico: low premiums, high crash rates. The cost lever matters less there, and the risk lever matters more. AAA puts new drivers aged 16 to 17 at roughly three times an adult's odds of a deadly crash per mile driven, and that exposure is what these states carry.

Supervised practice beyond the state minimum, a night driving limit stricter than the law requires and a passenger restriction held longer than the statute demands are all associated with lower crash risk in IIHS research. Practice is also worth targeting at road type rather than hours alone: a teen who has logged 70 hours in a parking lot and on interstates has not driven the two-lane roads where rural crashes happen.

Families in these states should also consider whether their liability limits are adequate, since low premiums often accompany low state minimum requirements that leave a family exposed after a serious at-fault crash.

Weather adds a third risk variable in Alaska, Idaho, Montana and Wyoming, which each log 127 to 214 adverse-weather days a year. Winter driving instruction is worth more in those states than any discount. See MoneyGeek's Most Dangerous States for Winter Driving for state-level winter crash data.

State rankings stop being abstract the moment a family insures a 16-year-old. A Florida family pays $7,812 a year. A Mississippi family pays $2,430 and puts that driver on the deadliest roads in the country.

Two things could move this map. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) replaces the 2024 crash file with final counts in early 2027, and North Dakota is still carrying the largest available improvement of any state, a projected 56% reduction it hasn't taken. Until one of those lands, the column worth reading is the crash rate: price measures the state a family lives in, not the road a 16-year-old is about to drive.

Methodology

MoneyGeek scored 49 states across four pillars to identify where conditions are worst for a new driver in 2026. Each metric was normalized to a 0-to-100 scale using min-max normalization, where 100 represents the worst value observed. Pillar scores were combined into a weighted composite. Rank 1 indicates the state with the worst overall conditions.

Full Dataset: All 49 States

The full ranking spans 55.9 points, from Florida at 67.9 to Massachusetts at 12, with the crash rate, premium, licensing reduction and driving conditions behind each state's score.

1
Florida
67.9
57.2
$651
$7,812
45%
58
16%
2
Louisiana
66.5
54.3
$624
$7,482
42%
62
38%
3
Mississippi
64.9
71.5
$203
$2,430
48%
67
59%
4
New Mexico
64.7
70.1
$259
$3,102
47%
45
59%
4
Montana
64.7

50

$250
$3,000
53%
145
71%
6
Arizona
62.7
69.2
$422
$5,064
41%
46
26%
7
Tennessee
58.7
57.8
$370
$4,434
42%
83
38%
8
Missouri

58

52.8
$361
$4,332
45%
73
45%
9
Alaska
56.4
35.9
$385
$4,614
43%
214
43%
10
Wyoming
55.4
43.1
$301
$3,612
42%
127
73%
11
Texas
54.8
52.8
$406
$4,872
44%
41
27%
12
Idaho
51.9
32.7
$236
$2,832
51%
154
57%
13
North Dakota
50.7
26.3
$221
$2,652
56%
121
68%
14
Oklahoma
50.2
55.6
$220
$2,634
40%
62
49%
15
Kansas
48.9
42.1
$281
$3,366
46%
61
47%
16
North Carolina
48.4
59.3
$184
$2,208
38%
71
39%
17
Arkansas
47.1
34.8
$250
$2,994
50%
78
47%
18
Delaware
46.4

43

$574
$6,888
26%
61
27%
19
Iowa
45.6
18.9
$284
$3,408
55%
90
59%
20
South Dakota
43.8
28.9
$141
$1,686
50%
99
70%
21
Alabama
43.5

42

$175
$2,100
45%
75
40%
22
South Carolina
43.4
42.2
$193
$2,310
45%
65
38%
23
Colorado
42.9
48.1
$308
$3,696
32%
79
29%
24
Nevada
42.5
50.5
$328
$3,936
26%
123
21%
25
Vermont †
42.4
34.6
$174
$2,088
40%
100
73%
25
West Virginia
42.4
38.4
$293
$3,516
31%
115
57%
27
Wisconsin

42

30.5
$255
$3,060
43%
90
52%
28
Nebraska
39.5
33.5
$163
$1,950
45%
63
53%
29
Michigan
39.3
33.1
$226
$2,712
42%
104
31%
30
Georgia
38.7

39

$324
$3,888
33%
66
31%
31
Utah
38.2
23.1
$404
$4,848
33%
152
28%
32
Washington
37.6
30.3
$371
$4,452
34%
90
28%
33
Illinois

37

31.1
$274
$3,282
42%
65
24%
34
Indiana
36.5
44.6
$232
$2,778
29%
69
39%
35
Maine
36.2
35.4
$165
$1,980
31%
109
66%
36
New Hampshire

34

24.1
$192
$2,304
41%
112
40%
37
Virginia

32

33.9
$166
$1,992
37%
73
30%
38
Pennsylvania
31.6
29.8
$315
$3,780
27%
88
37%
39
Ohio
31.5

30

$172
$2,064
39%
76
30%
40
Oregon

31

34.9
$134
$1,608
32%
97
41%
41
Maryland
30.4
34.9
$429
$5,142
19%
65
20%
42
Minnesota
29.5
16.3
$201
$2,412
43%
77
40%
43
Connecticut
29.1
29.7
$517
$6,204
17%
72
10%
44
New York
28.5
22.5
$435
$5,220
24%
86
21%
45
California
24.1
38.4
$161
$1,932
26%
48
19%
46
Rhode Island †
22.8
16.4
$321
$3,852
32%
68
10%
47
Hawaii
22.7
29.5
$72
$864
37%
54
18%
48
New Jersey
16.4

20

$275
$3,300
23%
66
7%
49
Massachusetts

12

21.2
$223
$2,676
18%
78
5%

About Nathan Paulus


Nathan Paulus, Head of Content and SEO, MoneyGeek

Nathan Paulus is the Senior Director of Content and SEO at MoneyGeek, where he leads content strategy and produces original data research across insurance, consumer costs, transportation safety, housing, public policy and personal finance. He also reviews published studies for methodology, source quality and factual accuracy before they reach readers.

Research and Analysis

In more than six years at MoneyGeek, Nathan has published more than 100 original studies and explanatory guides. His insurance research includes 50-state comparisons of health care outcomes, costs and access, plus an analysis of how uninsured rates track with state Medicaid expansion decisions and electoral patterns. He has analyzed full coverage auto rates across major insurers in all 50 states and tracked how premium trends relate to industry underwriting losses. The analysis draws on combined ratio data from Fitch Ratings and AM Best, plus Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI figures. Beyond insurance, his work spans vehicle pricing trends across the U.S. new car market, summer traffic fatality rates by state, homeowner underinsurance ratios using mortgage and policy data, and housing affordability across all 50 states.

His research has been cited by Bloomberg, the Los Angeles Times, Forbes, Fast Company, the San Francisco Chronicle, USA Today and NBC Los Angeles. Harvard, MIT, Stanford and Yale have referenced his work.

Career

Nathan traces his interest in personal finance back to his grandmother, who ran her household on a simple rule: spend less than you make and save the difference before anything else. That rule shows up in his work today. His writing skips jargon and complex strategy in favor of the basics that help someone living paycheck to paycheck.

He joined MoneyGeek in July 2020 as Director of Content Marketing, where he led the content team and oversaw data journalism production across insurance and personal finance verticals. A promotion to Head of Marketing and Communications followed in December 2023. The new role added digital PR and communications strategy to his scope. He has held his current position, Head of Content and SEO, since January 2025.

Before MoneyGeek, Nathan served as Director of Content Marketing and SEO at Ventrix Advertising, where he helped build two content sites from scratch, contributed to link-building programs that generated more than 1,500 unique referring domains within a year and co-managed a marketing team of more than 20 people. Two and a half years at ABUV Media preceded that role. He advanced from Marketing Research Analyst to Senior Marketing Tactics Analyst, where he developed skills in audience research, content strategy and SEO.


Sources