Your Workers' Comp Bill Has Nothing to Do With Your Workers

Advertising & Editorial Disclosure

A roofing company with $500,000 in annual payroll pays roughly $5,900 a year for workers' compensation in North Dakota. The same company, with the same crew doing the same work, pays roughly $144,200 in Georgia. The risk didn't change. The state did.

Workers' compensation is one of the largest fixed costs a small business carries, and it's one of the few that swings this hard on geography alone. Premiums for a roofer run from $28.84 per $100 of payroll in Georgia down to $1.18 in North Dakota, a 24-times difference for identical work, according to the Oregon DCBS 2024 Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Study. The dispersion tracks how each state regulates its insurance market, not how dangerous the job is.

mglogo icon
KEY FINDINGS
  • Workers' comp premiums vary by about 5 times across states, from $2.52 per $100 of payroll in Hawaii to $0.50 in North Dakota, as of Jan. 1, 2024.
  • For roofers, the spread widens to 24 times: $28.84 in Georgia versus $1.18 in North Dakota.
  • The 2024 national median was $1.09 per $100 of payroll, the lowest since the study began in 1986.
  • Rating system alone doesn't set cost. Hawaii, the most expensive state, uses the same NCCI system as most cheap states. North Dakota, the cheapest, runs a monopolistic state fund.
  • New York employers pay an estimated $269 per employee monthly. Indiana employers pay $63.
  • The four states that bar private insurers entirely (North Dakota, Ohio, Washington, Wyoming) land everywhere on the scale, from cheapest in the country to the expensive third.

Roofing Workers' Comp Rates by State

Roofing workers' comp rates vary by as much as 24 times across states, depending on where the work is done.

Source: Oregon DCBS, Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Study, June 2025.

Note: Rates are calculated manual rates per $100 of payroll for NCCI class 5551 (Roofing-All Kinds and Drivers) as of Jan. 1, 2024, including applicable loss cost multipliers and assessments. North Dakota, Ohio, Washington and Wyoming are monopolistic state funds. Utah rate not available.

Premiums Vary 5 Times Across States, 24 Times for Roofers

The spread between the most and least expensive states is about 5 times, from $2.52 per $100 of payroll in Hawaii to $0.50 in North Dakota. Two employers running the same business with the same risk pay multiples apart based only on where they operate. The priciest states sit above 170% of the national median; the cheapest fall below 60%.

1
Hawaii
$2.52
2
New Jersey
$2.16
3
New York
$1.98
4
California
$1.86
5
Vermont
$1.60
51
North Dakota
$0.50
50
Arkansas
$0.53
49
West Virginia
$0.54
48
Utah
$0.63
47
Ohio
$0.68
mglogo icon

MoneyGeek's own cost modeling shows the same pattern. Our modeled data puts the average workers' comp cost by state at $269 per employee monthly in New York, the most expensive, down to $63 in Indiana. New York and California rank near the top of both the Oregon regulatory benchmark and MoneyGeek's cost model, and Arkansas and Indiana rank near the bottom of both.

The Riskier the Trade, the Wider the Spread

The 5-times spread across all industries understates what happens at the class level. We pulled manual rates for five occupations across all 51 jurisdictions:

Roofing
Georgia, $28.84
North Dakota, $1.18
24x
Outside sales
Louisiana, $1.19
Massachusetts, $0.09
13x
Clerical
Hawaii, $0.48
Washington, $0.04
12x
Carpentry
New York, $17.93
West Virginia, $1.95
9x
Machinery repair
Hawaii, $8.45
West Virginia, $1.79
5x

A clerical worker's rate varies 12 times but stays pennies everywhere. A roofer's rate varies 24 times and turns into real money: the difference between $1.18 and $28.84 on every $100 of wages. For a roofing company with $500,000 in annual payroll, that's roughly $5,900 in North Dakota against $144,200 in Georgia.

Employers can estimate their own exposure with MoneyGeek's workers' comp cost calculator.

Why the Same Job Costs So Much More Across a State Line

The difference doesn't track injury rates. It tracks regulatory structure: how the state sets rates, whether it runs a monopolistic fund, and how it structures benefits and attorney fees.

  • Rate-setting method: Most states (37 of 51) use NCCI advisory loss costs. Ten run their own rating bureaus, and the independent-bureau states at the top (New Jersey, New York, California, Wisconsin) are among the most expensive. But rating system alone doesn't determine cost: Hawaii, the single most expensive state, uses NCCI.
  • Monopolistic state funds: Four states (North Dakota, Ohio, Washington, Wyoming) require employers to buy from a state fund rather than private insurers. North Dakota, the cheapest state overall, and Ohio (rank 47) are products of that structure. Washington (rank 12) and Wyoming (rank 8) show that a monopolistic fund doesn't guarantee low rates.
  • Benefit and legal-system rules: States set their own benefit schedules, attorney-fee rules and medical fee structures, all of which feed back into premium.

The risk doesn't change when you cross a state line. The regulation does.

For the state-by-state rules on who must carry coverage and where you can buy it, see MoneyGeek's workers' comp requirements guide.

Full Dataset: Workers' Comp Rates by State (2024)

Index rate is premium per $100 of payroll, weighted to a common industry mix. Occupation columns are calculated manual rates per $100 of payroll for the listed NCCI class. Rating system shows how each state sets rates. Sorted by index rate, most to least expensive.

1
Hawaii
$2.52
231%
NCCI
$18.02
$9.23
$8.45
$1.01
$0.48
2
New Jersey
$2.16
198%
Independent bureau
$6.41
$15.99
$6.41
$0.4
$0.17
3
New York
$1.98
182%
Independent bureau
$23.22
$17.93
$4.97
$0.34
$0.18
4
California
$1.86
170%
Independent bureau
$15.68
$8.41
$4.61
$0.34
$0.24
5
Vermont
$1.6
147%
NCCI
$15.04
$6.41
$4.48
$0.42
$0.19
6
Connecticut
$1.48
135%
NCCI
$18.34
$8.08
$5.0
$0.28
$0.11
7
Wisconsin
$1.42
130%
Independent bureau
$17.81
$6.63
$4.38
$0.33
$0.17
8
Wyoming
$1.41
130%
Monopolistic state fund
$3.32
$3.32
$3.32
$0.47
$0.4
9
Louisiana
$1.41
129%
NCCI
$12.83
$5.64
$3.12
$1.19
$0.21
10
Rhode Island
$1.38
127%
NCCI
$14.86
$5.09
$3.38
$0.32
$0.14
11
Maine
$1.37
125%
NCCI
$4.2
$6.41
$3.57
$0.36
$0.2
12
Washington
$1.35
123%
Monopolistic state fund
$13.46
$8.95
$4.09
$0.13
$0.04
13
Illinois
$1.34
123%
NCCI
$13.44
$6.66
$4.59
$0.25
$0.09
14
Montana
$1.34
122%
NCCI
$4.31
$6.1
$3.6
$0.4
$0.22
15
Oklahoma
$1.33
122%
NCCI
$13.96
$5.49
$3.25
$0.36
$0.16
16
Missouri
$1.31
120%
NCCI
$15.16
$4.58
$4.36
$0.28
$0.14
17
Minnesota
$1.25
114%
Independent bureau
$4.24
$6.33
$4.81
$0.27
$0.12
18
New Hampshire
$1.22
112%
NCCI
$12.83
$6.36
$3.4
$0.21
$0.11
19
Iowa
$1.21
110%
NCCI
$11.18
$5.82
$3.75
$0.31
$0.16
20
Alaska
$1.16
106%
NCCI
$12.45
$5.05
$3.35
$0.36
$0.25
21
Pennsylvania
$1.14
105%
Independent bureau
$3.43
$5.56
$2.86
$0.25
$0.1
22
South Dakota
$1.13
103%
NCCI
$11.52
$5.34
$2.98
$0.36
$0.16
23
Nebraska
$1.12
103%
NCCI
$9.64
$5.51
$3.69
$0.32
$0.14
24
Alabama
$1.11
101%
NCCI
$10.71
$4.09
$3.18
$0.28
$0.13
25
Idaho
$1.1
101%
NCCI
$3.09
$6.62
$3.18
$0.25
$0.13
26
Georgia
$1.09
100%
NCCI
$28.84
$4.56
$2.95
$0.24
$0.11
27
New Mexico
$1.05
96%
NCCI
$10.83
$4.58
$2.49
$0.36
$0.17
28
Colorado
$1.05
96%
NCCI
$10.03
$4.16
$2.43
$0.19
$0.1
29
South Carolina
$1.03
94%
NCCI
$17.19
$4.09
$3.34
$0.34
$0.16
30
Florida
$1.0
92%
NCCI
$3.4
$4.54
$2.88
$0.25
$0.13
31
Massachusetts
$0.97
89%
Independent bureau
$9.42
$7.42
$3.75
$0.09
$0.04
32
Delaware
$0.97
89%
Independent bureau
$2.87
$3.91
$2.56
$0.31
$0.08
33
North Carolina
$0.95
87%
NCCI
$13.5
$4.46
$3.05
$0.21
$0.09
34
Mississippi
$0.94
86%
NCCI
$8.39
$3.45
$2.43
$0.27
$0.16
35
Kansas
$0.91
83%
NCCI
$9.67
$4.35
$2.12
$0.19
$0.1
36
Michigan
$0.9
82%
Independent bureau
$2.76
$5.65
$2.57
$0.15
$0.08
37
Maryland
$0.89
82%
NCCI
$10.23
$4.85
$2.57
$0.18
$0.08
38
Oregon
$0.89
82%
NCCI
$10.09
$4.49
$2.39
$0.16
$0.06
39
Tennessee
$0.8
73%
NCCI
$9.63
$3.62
$2.05
$0.23
$0.11
40
Texas
$0.78
72%
NCCI
$2.57
$3.52
$2.57
$0.18
$0.07
41
Kentucky
$0.76
70%
NCCI
$8.31
$4.14
$2.36
$0.2
$0.12
42
Nevada
$0.73
67%
NCCI
$5.43
$3.33
$2.22
$0.32
$0.09
43
District of Columbia
$0.73
67%
NCCI
$2.06
$3.46
$2.51
$0.1
$0.06
44
Virginia
$0.73
67%
NCCI
$8.79
$2.98
$2.32
$0.11
$0.07
45
Indiana
$0.71
65%
Independent bureau
$1.82
$2.71
$2.08
$0.16
$0.11
46
Arizona
$0.7
64%
NCCI
$5.39
$4.31
$2.58
$0.16
$0.08
47
Ohio
$0.68
63%
Monopolistic state fund
$1.9
$2.06
$2.18
$0.1
$0.06
48
Utah
$0.63
57%
NCCI
$6.17
$3.38
$1.85
$0.16
$0.06
49
West Virginia
$0.54
49%
NCCI
$4.94
$1.95
$1.79
$0.14
$0.09
50
Arkansas
$0.53
48%
NCCI
$1.62
$2.63
$2.0
$0.13
$0.07
51
North Dakota
$0.5
45%
Monopolistic state fund
$1.18
$2.91
$1.98
$0.16
$0.07

Methodology

We pulled index rates and per-class rates from the Oregon DCBS Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Study, using 2024 rates published in June 2025. It's the only source that benchmarks all 50 states and Washington, D.C. on a common industry mix. The study surveys every state every two years and weights rates to Oregon's 50 largest industry classes, so each state compares on the same payroll mix. The headline figure is the index rate: premium per $100 of payroll. For occupation-specific figures, we used the study's calculated manual rates by NCCI class code and tagged each state by rating system: NCCI, independent bureau or monopolistic state fund.

We checked the Oregon regulatory benchmark against MoneyGeek's workers' comp cost model, built from more than 1 million modeled estimates across 408 industries and 46 states plus Washington, D.C. The two datasets agree on direction. The Oregon index rate is what the underlying risk costs before insurer adjustments; what any individual employer pays shifts further with experience modifiers, schedule rating, discounts, deductible credits and broker fees. The Oregon study doesn't publish class 3632, so we used the closest published equivalent, Machinery or Equipment Repair (3724).

About Nathan Paulus


Nathan Paulus, Head of Content and SEO, MoneyGeek

Nathan Paulus is Head of Content and SEO at MoneyGeek, where he leads content strategy and produces original data research across insurance, consumer costs, transportation safety, housing, public policy and personal finance. He also reviews published studies for methodology, source quality and factual accuracy before they reach readers.

Research and Analysis

In nearly six years at MoneyGeek, Paulus has published more than 100 original studies and explanatory guides. His insurance research includes 50-state comparisons of health care outcomes, costs and access; an analysis of how uninsured rates track with state Medicaid expansion decisions and electoral patterns; full coverage auto rate analyses across major insurers in all 50 states; and a study of how premium trends track with industry underwriting losses, with combined ratio data sourced from Fitch Ratings, AM Best and Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI figures. His research also covers vehicle pricing trends across the U.S. new car market, summer traffic fatality rates by state, homeowner underinsurance ratios using mortgage and policy data, and housing affordability across all 50 states.

His research has been cited by Bloomberg, the Los Angeles Times, Forbes, Fast Company, the San Francisco Chronicle, USA Today and NBC Los Angeles. Harvard, MIT, Stanford and Yale have also referenced his work.

Career

Growing up, Paulus developed an early interest in personal finance through his grandmother, who emphasized saving over earning as the foundation of financial stability. Her framing still shows up in how he writes about money for people without a financial background.

Paulus joined MoneyGeek in July 2020 as Director of Content Marketing. In that role, he led the content team and directed data journalism production across insurance and personal finance verticals. He was promoted to Head of Marketing and Communications in December 2023, where he took on digital PR and communications strategy. He has held his current role as Head of Content and SEO since January 2025.

Before MoneyGeek, he served as Director of Content Marketing and SEO at Ventrix Advertising. There, he helped build two content sites from scratch, contributed to link-building programs that secured more than 1,500 unique referring domains within a year, and co-managed a marketing team of more than 20 people. Earlier, he spent two and a half years at ABUV Media, moving up from Marketing Research Analyst to Senior Marketing Tactics Analyst, where he built his grounding in audience research, content strategy and SEO.


Sources