ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance


Is ASPCA or Figo Pet Insurance Better?

Based on our pet insurance study, ASPCA is better than Figo overall, ranking higher for affordability and coverage. ASPCA has the lowest rates for both dogs and cats, with savings up to 52% against the national average depending on your pet's age. It also has a broader base plan, including exam fees and parasite treatment, plus a shorter orthopedic waiting period, making ASPCA better if you're focused on cost savings without giving up broad coverage.

Figo, meanwhile, has slightly better customer service than ASPCA, with faster claims submission and approval, so consider it a smooth claims experience matters to you.

Overall Score
4.66 out of 5
4.37 out of 5
Average Monthly Rate
  • Dogs: $41
  • Cats: $18
  • Dogs: $55
  • Cats: $29
Customer Experience Score
4.35 out of 5
4.47 out of 5
Coverage Score
4.29 out of 5
4.19 out of 5
Best Fit for

Pet owners looking for the most affordable pet insurance rates without sacrificing coverage breadth and those who want a short waiting period for knee and ligament conditions.

Pet owners who want competitive rates and next-day accident coverage, as well as those with mixed-breed pets who don't need high annual limits to access 100% reimbursement.

Not an Ideal Fit for

Pet owners who want immediate accident coverage or streamlined processes for buying pet insurance, managing policies and submitting claims.

Pet owners looking for a shorter orthopedic waiting period and those who want a broad base coverage with more policy customization options.

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Coverage

ASPCA has broader pet insurance coverage than Figo overall. Both providers include prescription medications, behavioral issues, physical rehabilitation and alternative treatments in their base plans, but ASPCA goes further, covering exam fees, parasite treatment and prescription pet food at no extra cost. This makes ASPCA a stronger fit if your pet needs frequent vet visits, is at risk for parasites, or your vet prescribes pet food for a covered condition like kidney disease or diabetes, since those expenses are already included instead of needing add-on coverage.

But Figo is the only insurer in my analysis to offer a 100% reimbursement option, accessible for $500 to $750 deductibles and $5,000 to $10,000 annual limits. These terms suit a healthy mixed-breed pet better than a high-risk purebred that could hit that ceiling mid-policy year.

Where ASPCA pet insurance is better
Where Figo pet insurance is better

Shorter waiting for orthopedic conditions at 14 days

Next-day coverage for accidents after enrollment

Shorter symptom-free waiting period for curable pre-existing conditions at 180 days

100% reimbursement rate option for select deductibles and annual limits

Coverage for exam fees, parasite treatment and prescription food in the base plan

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Coverage Terms

ASPCA and Figo take similar approaches in several core policy terms, but there are a few differences that can affect your out-of-pocket costs and how soon coverage begins.

  • Reimbursement rates: ASPCA has up to 90% reimbursement, while Figo has a 100% reimbursement option when paired with $500 or $750 deductibles and $5,000 or $10,000 annual limits, so there's more flexibility for pet owners who want the highest possible reimbursement.
  • Exam fees: ASPCA includes exam fees in its base accident and illness policy, while Figo requires you to purchase an optional add-on to receive reimbursement for office visits, emergency exam fees and specialist consultation fees.
  • Waiting period for accidents: Figo has a 1-day waiting period for accidents, compared with 14 days for ASPCA, so Figo is the better choice if you want accident coverage to begin almost immediately.
  • Waiting period for orthopedic conditions: ASPCA covers orthopedic conditions after a 14-day waiting period, whereas Figo applies a six-month orthopedic waiting period. ASPCA is better if you're concerned about joint or ligament injuries occurring soon after enrollment.
  • Pre-existing conditions: ASPCA covers curable pre-existing conditions after 180 symptom-free days, faster than Figo that requires a 12-month symptom-free period before a curable condition may be eligible for coverage again.

The table details ASPCA's and Figo's coverage offerings:

$100, $250, $500, $750
$100, $250, $500, $750
$2,500, $3,000, $5,000, $7,000, $10,000, Unlimited
$5,000, $10,000, Unlimited
70%, 80%, 90%
70%, 80%, 90%, 100%

14 days for accidents, illnesses, knee or ligament conditions and orthopedic conditions

1 day for accidents, 14 days for illnesses, six months for orthopedic conditions

Enrollment restrictions
No upper age limit
No upper age limit
Pre-existing conditions
Curable conditions may qualify for coverage after 180 symptom-free days
Curable conditions may be covered after 12 symptom-free months
Diagnostics
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Fractures and broken bones
✓
✓
Foreign body ingestion
✓
✓
Lacerations and bite wounds
✓
✓
Parasite treatment
✓
X
✓
✓
Digestive illnesses
✓
✓
Hereditary and congenital conditions
✓
✓
Chronic conditions
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Behavioral conditions
✓
✓
Physical therapy
✓
✓
Alternative therapy
✓
✓

Coverage varies by state and policy terms. Always review your specific policy documents to understand exact coverage terms, exclusions and limitations.

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Coverage Add-Ons

Figo has more optional add-ons than ASPCA, but the advantage is smaller than it looks because its vet-exam-fees add-on is already included in ASPCA's base policy.

Both insurers have preventive care coverage, but ASPCA's add-on gives more flexibility, with two wellness tiers and separate annual reimbursement amounts for many routine services, including individual vaccine categories.

Figo's single-tier wellness add-on groups all covered vaccines under one $50 annual reimbursement, so you may hit that limit faster if your pet needs several vaccinations during the policy year.

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Affordability

ASPCA has lower pet insurance costs than Figo across every age group for both dogs and cats, with savings up to 52%. ASPCA also has the cheapest pet insurance for most medium-sized dog breeds (30 to 60 pounds) and pet owners in the West region.

Figo, meanwhile, is the most affordable option for Australian Mists and select giant dog breeds (over 100 pounds), including Caucasian Shepherd Dogs and Central Asian Shepherd Dogs.

Kittens
$11
$15
ASPCA
27%
Puppies
$27
$41
ASPCA
34%
Young Cats
$11
$13
ASPCA
15%
Young Dogs
$27
$33
ASPCA
18%
Middle-Aged Cats
$18
$29
ASPCA
38%
Middle-Aged Dogs
$41
$55
ASPCA
25%
Senior Cats
$42
$87
ASPCA
52%
Senior Dogs
$77
$122
ASPCA
37%

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance Discounts

ASPCA has more pet insurance discounts than Figo: four ways to save compared to Figo's three. Figo is the better choice for Costco and military members, with 15% and 5% discounts respectively. ASPCA is better for veterinary employees and anyone insuring multiple pets, with savings up to 10% for both groups.

Multiple pets
Save 10% when enrolling more than one pet.
Save 5% when you insure more than one pet.
Employer group plan
Offers 10% off for joining a participating employer's benefit program.
None.
Association or club membership
Get 10% off if you’re a member of certain associations, such as REALTOR benefits programs.
Provides 15% off for Costco members who enroll through the Costco program.
Veterinary staff
Receive 10% off for working as an employee at a veterinary practice.
None.
Military
None.
Get 5% off if you’re an active duty member or a veteran.

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Customer Experience

Figo has one of the easiest claims submission experiences, letting you upload invoices and medical records in minutes while tracking claim status throughout the review. It also processes claims quickly, with reimbursements deposited within days of receiving complete documentation.

ASPCA's overall customer service is functional, without remarkable features to improve the experience. But it beats Figo on making claim decisions that fairly align with your policy terms and documented medical history, even though it isn't among the best for claims fairness overall.

Figo ranks ahead of ASPCA for customer experience, though both companies land in the bottom tier of my analysis for dogs and cats, with Figo at 13th and ASPCA at 16th.

Overall customer experience score
4.35 out of 5
4.47 out of 5
Buying experience score
4.35 out of 5
4.38 out of 5
Policy management experience score
4.31 out of 5
4.59 out of 5
Claims experience score
4.34 out of 5
4.43 out of 5
Customer experience strengths

Processes claims within a reasonable timeframe, makes fair claim decisions and provides helpful sales support for first-time pet insurance buyers

Has one of the easiest claim submission processes, reviews claims relatively fast and offers a smooth onboarding for new policyholders 

Customer experience weaknesses

Its mobile app doesn't have any standout features outside of letting you do basic tasks, while renewal communications tend to be unclear, requiring policyholders to contact support for clarity

May adjust your quoted rate after reviewing your vet records when you submit a coverage application and its appeals process rarely provides successful reversals, especially for claims involving pre-existing condition terms 

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Bottom Line

ASPCA is the stronger choice for broad financial protection at a lower monthly cost. Figo is slightly better for customer experience, but it generally charges higher rates and offers less coverage flexibility.

Before choosing either provider, make sure you can answer these questions:

  • How much can you comfortably spend each month?
  • Which treatments or services do you want covered for your pet's breed and age?
  • How much financial risk are you willing to pay out of pocket through deductibles, reimbursement rates and annual limits?
  • Which are your top priorities among affordability, customer experience and coverage?

Answering makes it easier to find the provider that best matches your budget, coverage priorities and expectations for the overall policy experience.

ASPCA vs. Figo Pet Insurance: Our Process

To build our ASPCA and Figo rankings, my team and I analyzed more than 67,000 pet profiles across breeds, ages and states, collecting quotes, testing the buying and claims experience firsthand and reviewing policy documents line by line. Our national scores are based on a 6-year-old Labrador Retriever and a 7-year-old Ragdoll, each with a $5,000 annual limit, $500 deductible and 80% reimbursement rate. 

For a full breakdown of how we score each category, visit our methodology page.

About Ritchel Mendiola


Ritchel Mendiola, Pet Insurance Writer

Ritchel Mendiola is a Pet Insurance Content Writer at MoneyGeek. She produces coverage guides, provider comparisons and cost analyses so pet owners can understand their options and avoid overpaying.

Ritchel spent over four years as a News and Feature Writer at Asian Journal Publications, where she reported for the Asian Journal newspaper and Balikbayan Magazine, conducted interviews and covered media events. At MoneyGeek, she covers policy terms, exclusions, waiting periods and reimbursement structures the way she treated news facts. They're sourced, verified and reported accurately rather than summarized from marketing copy.

She joined MoneyGeek in late 2021 in the loans vertical and moved to pet insurance content, which she now leads. Her published work includes provider comparisons, breed-specific cost guides, age-specific coverage analyses and state-level pricing studies, all from the vertical's 5 million pet insurance profiles across 18 major providers and all U.S. states.

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rianmendi/

Contact Email: ritchel.mendiola@moneygeek.com