MoneyGeek scored Allstate and Farmers on homeowners insurance across affordability (55%), customer experience (35%) and coverage breadth (10%). Farmers earned a 4.30 composite and Allstate a 4.20. That gap is narrow enough that the right choice depends entirely on your profile — and in our analysis, the data split in ways the summary scores don't show.
- Affordability: Farmers scores 4.56 vs. Allstate's 4.52 and costs $157 less per year on a standard $250,000 dwelling profile. But when we ran all 2,700 profile combinations, Allstate came out cheaper for homeowners with poor credit ($8,458 vs. Farmers' $10,719) and for coverage tiers at $500,000 and above. If your credit is less than good or you're insuring a high-value home, Allstate's pricing structure works in your favor despite the lower overall score.
- Customer Experience: Farmers leads 4.26 to 3.88, the widest gap between the two insurers. The difference shows up most clearly in J.D. Power claims handling data. For homeowners who expect to file a claim and want a smoother process through it, Farmers' service advantage is the most defensible reason to pay more.
- Coverage: Allstate scores 3.69 to Farmers' 3.47 and offers nine optional add-ons vs. Farmers' five. The breadth advantage matters if you want specialized protections like Sports Equipment coverage or Electronic Data Recovery. Farmers' narrower menu includes two endorsements Allstate doesn't offer, Matching of Undamaged Property and Residence Glass Coverage, which are worth prioritizing if either fits your situation.
The honest summary: Farmers wins for most standard profiles and for homeowners who weight service quality highly. Allstate is the better fit if you have poor credit, insure a high-value home, or want the widest endorsement menu.







