Universal life insurance offers flexible premiums and adjustable death benefits with variable interest rates tied to the insurer's portfolio, requiring active monitoring to avoid lapse. Whole life insurance provides fixed premiums, guaranteed cash value growth, and predictable lifetime coverage without management needs, making it ideal for hands-off buyers prioritizing stability.
Universal Life vs. Whole Life Insurance: Differences, Pros & Cons
Universal and whole life insurance are two types of permanent life insurance policies. The key difference is that universal life provides more control over the policy and flexibility to make changes as life situations occur.

Updated: November 12, 2025
Advertising & Editorial Disclosure
Both universal and whole life insurance are types of permanent life insurance offering lifelong coverage, but they differ in premium flexibility and investment options.
Universal life insurance offers adjustable premiums and death benefits, ideal for those seeking flexibility and control over their policy's terms.
Whole life insurance features fixed premiums and guaranteed benefits, well-suited for individuals desiring stability and predictable long-term financial planning.
What's the Difference Between Universal and Whole Life Insurance?
Coverage Duration | Lifetime coverage (if properly funded) | Lifetime coverage |
Premium Structure | Flexible, can vary payments | Fixed premiums |
Cash Value Growth | Variable rate tied to insurer’s portfolio | Fixed, guaranteed rate |
Interest Rate | Current rate that fluctuates | Guaranteed minimum rate plus dividends |
Death Benefit Flexibility | Adjustable up or down | Fixed |
Policy Management | Requires active monitoring | Set-it-and-forget-it |
Premium Costs | Lower initial premiums | Higher, consistent premiums |
Best For | Disciplined buyers wanting flexibility and lower initial costs | Buyers prioritizing simplicity, guarantees, and hands-off management |
Read More |
Universal vs. Whole Life Insurance: Pros and Cons
Each type of life insurance has unique advantages and limitations. Evaluating the pros and cons of universal life vs. whole life insurance helps in choosing a policy that best aligns with your financial strategy and life goals.
- Flexibility in Premiums: Adjust premiums based on financial changes
- Adjustable Coverage: Modify death benefits to suit evolving needs
- Investment Control: Direct involvement in investment choices
- Potential for Higher Returns: Possibility of greater returns based on market performance
- Adaptability: Tailor policy to changing life circumstances
- Market Dependence: Returns vary with market fluctuations
- Active Management Required: Needs regular policy monitoring
- No Dividend Payments: Lacks the potential for dividends
- Risk of Policy Lapse: Inadequate funding can lead to policy termination
- Guaranteed Benefits: Fixed death benefit and cash value growth
- Stable Premiums: Premiums remain constant throughout policy life
- Dividend Earning: Potential to earn dividends, enhancing value
- Simple Management: Less need for active policy monitoring
- Predictable Cash Value Growth: Steady, guaranteed cash value accumulation
- Higher Premiums: Generally more expensive than universal life
- Less Flexibility: Fixed premiums and death benefits
- Limited Investment Control: Investments managed by the insurer
- Slow Cash Value Growth: Steadier but slower cash accumulation
Cost of Universal Life Insurance vs. Whole Life Insurance
One main difference between universal and whole life insurance is the premium rates. The average cost of universal life insurance tends to be lower compared to whole life insurance, but higher than term life insurance. The table below shows average rates for a $500,000 policy by age group for nonsmokers of average height, weight and health:
25 | $151 (F) / $171 (M) | $310 (F) / $364 (M) | $159 more (F) / $193 more (M) |
30 | $184 (F) / $203 (M) | $399 (F) / $444 (M) | $215 more (F) / $241 more (M) |
35 | $216 (F) / $241 (M) | $490 (F) / $545 (M) | $274 more (F) / $304 more (M) |
40 | $254 (F) / $294 (M) | $605 (F) / $667 (M) | $351 more (F) / $373 more (M) |
45 | $312 (F) / $355 (M) | $767 (F) / $856 (M) | $455 more (F) / $501 more (M) |
50 | $393 (F) / $448 (M) | $1,025 (F) / $1,146 (M) | $632 more (F) / $698 more (M) |
55 | $493 (F) / $566 (M) | $1,322 (F) / $1,505 (M) | $829 more (F) / $939 more (M) |
60 | $627 (F) / $736 (M) | $1,738 (F) / $2,052 (M) | $1,111 more (F) / $1,316 more (M) |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
MoneyGeek answers the most common questions about universal life vs. whole life insurance.
Why is universal life cheaper than whole life?
Universal life insurance is generally cheaper than whole life insurance because it offers fewer guarantees and requires more active management, which reduces the insurer's risk.
Which is better whole life or universal life?
Whether whole life or universal life insurance is better depends on your financial stability and preference for flexibility versus predictability. Whole life insurance offers stability, while universal life insurance offers adaptability.
Is universal life insurance permanent?
Yes, universal life insurance is a form of permanent life insurance that provides lifelong coverage and includes a savings element that can grow or decrease based on policy management.
Related Articles
About Mandy Sleight

Mandy Sleight is a licensed property, casualty, life and health insurance agent with 20 years of experience in the industry. She has worked for major insurance companies like State Farm and Nationwide, and most recently as the Operations Coordinator for a startup employee benefits company.
Sleight holds a business administration and management degree from the University of Baltimore and a master's in business administration from Southern New Hampshire University. She uses her vast knowledge of insurance and personal finance to create easy-to-understand and engaging content to help readers make smarter choices with their budgets and finances.






