Opportunity Cost: If You Don't Know What It Is, You Might Regret It
How many times have you said to yourself, "If I don't do this, I'll regret it"?
Economists use the concept of opportunity cost to explain decision-making and the potential for regret. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from an alternative decision when a choice is made.
In other words, it's the regret you'll have for not making a different choice. For example, if you spend your time studying for an exam, the opportunity cost would be the time you could have spent having fun.
This concept acknowledges not just the explicit costs of a choice but also the implicit costs of what you forgo when you make that decision. Opportunity cost provides a framework for decision-making to find the most benefit, particularly for limited resources like time and money.
Opportunity Cost Example: Simple Investments
Within the context of investing, opportunity costs are the expected return on the investments you are evaluating. A simple example of opportunity cost in investing is in the bond markets. If you purchase bonds and hold them to maturity, they will provide a rate of return as stated. Pretend you have a bond that pays 5% and another that pays 2%, and you have $1,000 to invest. The expected return is $50 and $20, respectively. In this simple example, we can see that, all else equal, the bond paying $50 is the better choice. We can use this to illustrate how opportunity cost calculations are made.
Return on $1,000 Investment
The Formula for Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost can be calculated as:
FO is the return or value of the forgone option, and
CO is the return or value of the chosen option
The return on an option is signified as the benefit minus the explicit costs of that option. In the example above, the returns are $50 and $20. For a business, the return would be the profit it makes from selling its products.
Using this formula, when the opportunity cost is positive, it means there is an alternative option with a higher potential value than your current option. When the value of this equation is a negative number, there isn't a higher value option.
Opportunity Cost Calculation
The opportunity costs for these investments are as follows:
Scroll for more
- Investment OptionOpportunity CostWill You Regret It?
- 5% rate of return($20-$50) = -$30No - Opportunity Cost is negative.
- 2% rate of return($50-$20) = $30Yes - Opportunity cost is positive.
The -$30 and $30 are the opportunity costs of buying the other investment. That is, if you went with the 2% rate of return over the 5%, your "cost" or regret would be $30. In the instance where you select the 5% return investment, your "cost" is a negative $30, indicating you would not regret the decision.
Opportunity Cost Calculations: No Regrets With a Negative Number
This simple example helps us see how to calculate opportunity costs using the formula, but using opportunity costs has its challenges.
Opportunity Costs Can Be Hard to Determine
There are a couple of challenges to calculating opportunity costs. One challenge is that different people can value the same choices differently. In other words, they are subjective to individuals and situations. Another challenge is that in evaluating a decision, we may end up miscalculating the benefits.
Opportunity costs for the same choices can differ for different people and in different situations.
Example: Valuing Leisure Time
Opportunity costs can be more difficult to assign numbers to when you're talking about an example like leisure time. Let's say your employer calls and offers you an extra hour of work at your job. You know the forgone benefit of saying no to your employer: it is the wages you won't earn. But what's the benefit of that time off? That might differ depending on what you do with your time, for example:
- Running an important errand
- Spending time with loved ones
- Avoiding a long commute time
Thankfully, our brains are able to tell us what we value at the moment as it relates to our day-to-day lives.
Example: Opportunity Costs and Undervaluing Future Savings
In the last example, where you have an opportunity to earn an extra hour's worth of pay, we'll often neglect to consider the future value of our opportunities. If we work that extra hour and then invest those earnings in the future, it can grow to be worth much more.
There are many examples of the "skip the latte" argument in personal finance. Say you have a $5 latte every day instead of saving that $5. Over 20 years, you're not just missing out on the $36,500 you could have saved (365 days x $5 x 20 years). You're missing out on $61,655, which is the $36,500 you spent plus the investment returns you could have earned from compounding your savings for 20 years with a 5% annual investment return.
Opportunity Cost: Buying Daily Lattes vs. Investing the Savings
If you'd prefer to keep your latte, there are many ways to save, including reevaluating your budget, negotiating recurring expenses like insurance premiums, lowering interest rates and paying down debt.
The power of compounding investment returns can make the prospect of forgoing expenses today more compelling.
Opportunity Costs, Sunk Costs and the Sunk Cost Fallacy
Have you ever said or heard someone say, "I/we have already spent…" to justify why a choice is made?
Maybe you've heard a story of someone going to an outdoor concert to see an act they weren't that into in the pouring rain just because they had bought the ticket? Or a company continuing to spend money on a failing project because it had already spent a considerable amount on it? At some point, these people had a chance to reassess their situation and potentially back out, despite the costs they had already incurred. These already incurred costs are referred to as sunk costs, and they are costs you can't recover regardless of what you do.
Opportunity costs are strictly forward-looking and ignore costs you can't recover because they do not represent your benefit.
The Big Costly Project: A Sunk Cost Example
Say that a company has spent $5 million and two years implementing a new software system. They have one more year of work left and another $2.5 million to spend to complete the system. A new technology has come to the market that provides the same benefits. The new technology will take six months to implement and cost $2 million. In this example, the benefit is the same, so the opportunity costs are just the costs: one year for $2.5 million or six months for $2 million. The sunk cost is $5 million and the two years that had already been spent.
When the manager of the project starts to argue that the company has already invested $5 million in the technology, they are committing the sunk cost fallacy.
The sunk cost fallacy is sticking to a course of action when other options have a higher return/benefit.
Opportunity Costs Should Adjust For Risk and Uncertainty
Because opportunity costs are forward-looking, to the extent that it's possible, they should include measures of uncertainty. If you're looking at a set of investment opportunities, your decision should factor in the uncertainty of gains or losses, your time horizon to recover and your subjective ability to stomach potential losses. For this reason, it's a best practice in the investment profession to match an individual's investment portfolio to their risk tolerance and time horizon.
- When asked to explain opportunity costs, what is your go-to example?
- Can you provide a few examples of how individuals weigh opportunity costs every day?
- What are the drawbacks or challenges to weighing the opportunity cost when making decisions?
- Are there decision-making strategies individuals or organizations can use when the opportunity cost of a decision isn't clear-cut?
- What's a good way for individuals to think about the opportunity costs associated with saving money or spending it today?
Assistant Professor of Economics at Colorado State University
Graduate Program Coordinator, Professor, Department of Economics at Boise State University
Associate Professor of Business and Economics and Department Chair at Ursinus College
Associate Professor of Teaching Economics at University of California - Davis
Professor of Economics at Villanova University
Professor of Economics and Finance at Salisbury University
Professor of Economics and Head of the Economics Department at Washington and Lee University
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Author